Omicron (BA.1) and Sub-Variants (BA.1, BA.2 and BA.3) of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Infectivity and Pathogenicity: A Comparative Sequence and Structural-based Computational Assessment
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1002/jmv.27927
Abstract
The Omicron variant of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has now spread throughout the world. We used computational tools to assess the spike infectivity, transmission, and pathogenicity of Omicron (BA.1) and sub-variants (BA.1.1, BA.2, and BA.3) in this study. BA.1 has 39 mutations, BA.1.1 has 40 mutations, BA.2 has 31 mutations, and BA.3 has 34 mutations, with 21 shared mutations between all. We observed 11 common mutations in Omicron’s receptor-binding domain and sub-variants. In pathogenicity analysis, the Y505H, N786K, T95I, N211I, N856K, and V213R mutations in omicron and sub-variants are predicted to be deleterious. Due to the major effect of the mutations characterising, in the receptor-binding domain (RBD), we found that Omicron and sub-variants had a higher positive electrostatic surface potential. This could increase interaction between RBD and electronegative human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2). Omicron and sub-variants had a higher affinity for hACE2 and the potential for increased transmission when compared to the wild type. Among Omicron sub-lineages, BA.2 and BA.3 have a higher transmission potential than BA.1 and BA.1.1. We predicted that mutated residues in BA.1.1 (K478), BA.2 (R400, R490, R495), and BA.3 (R397 and H499) formation of new salt bridges and hydrogen bonds. Omicron and sub-variant mutations at Receptor-binding Motif (RBM) residues such as Q493R, N501Y, Q498, T478K, and Y505H all contribute significantly to binding affinity with human ACE2. Interactions with Omicron variant mutations at residues 493, 496, 498, and 501 seem to restore ACE2 binding effectiveness lost due to other mutations like K417N and Y505H.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 subvariants are genetically divergent.
“SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 subvariants are genetically divergent.”
From Duration of mRNA vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 subvariants in Qatar (2022) · cites this paper as [6]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 49 · Cited by 223
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Sievers F, Higgins DG. Clustal Omega. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics. 2014;48(1):3.13.11-13.13.16.
- Meng B, Ferreira IATM, Abdullahi A, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron spike mediated immune escape and tropism shift. bioRxiv. 2022:2021.2012.2017.473248.
- Pascarella S, Ciccozzi M, Bianchi M, Benvenuto D, Cauda R, Cassone A. The electrostatic potential of the Omicron variant spike is higher than in Delta and Delta- plus variants: A hint to higher transmissibility? Journal of Medical Virology.
- Authors
- Kumar, S., Karuppanan, K., & Subramaniam, G.
- Affiliations
- Management and Science University (MY)
- Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kumar, Suresh
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Virology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-02-11
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4780-4791
- ISSN
- 0146-6615 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9347785
- OpenAlex
- W4281939105
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 26.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Virology (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Oxford
- Management and Science University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
- Keywords
- Omicron variant, SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, BA.1, BA.2, BA.3, spike protein mutations, receptor binding domain, surface electrostatic potential, N-terminal domain, receptor-binding motif, salt bridges, hydrogen bonding, pathogenicity prediction, transmission potential, Omicron subvariants
- MeSH terms
- Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A, Receptors, Virus, Virulence, Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review