The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ancestral reconstruction of duplicated signaling proteins reveals the evolution of signaling specificity
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.7554/elife.77346 · Paper page
Abstract
Gene duplication is crucial to generating novel signaling pathways during evolution. However, it remains unclear how the redundant proteins produced by gene duplication ultimately acquire new interaction specificities to establish insulated paralogous signaling pathways. Here, we used ancestral sequence reconstruction to resurrect and characterize a bacterial two-component signaling system that duplicated in α-proteobacteria. We determined the interaction specificities of the signaling proteins that existed before and immediately after this duplication event and then identified key mutations responsible for establishing specificity in the two systems. Just three mutations, in only two of the four interacting proteins, were sufficient to establish specificity of the extant systems. Some of these mutations weakened interactions between paralogous systems to limit crosstalk. However, others strengthened interactions within a system, indicating that the ancestral interaction, although functional, had the potential to be strengthened. Our work suggests that protein-protein interactions with such latent potential may be highly amenable to duplication and divergence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020143 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.07864 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1240810 · DOI
- 10.7554/elife.02304 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000341 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1123348 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature08249 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-micro-091018-054627 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M110715200 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-micro-092611-150039 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001220 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.033 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2016.04.038 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msz189 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkh340 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003072 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msp230 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature10624 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2180-5-35 · DOI
- 10.1093/sysbio/syq010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-020-3021-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev-biophys-070816-033631 · DOI
- 10.7554/elife.04126 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.48 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026297 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msaa198 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-019-1639-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkw989 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkz1002 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)01077-8 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2292-y · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msp077 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06426.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2008.04.040 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030334 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature23902 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001446 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-021-23645-4 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aaa1823 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msm088 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature02178 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Nocedal, I., & Laub, M. T.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Laub, Michael T.
- Venue
- eLife
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-02-11
- Volume
- 11
- ISSN
- 2050-084X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9208753
- OpenAlex
- W4282940566
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- National Institutes of Health (1f32gm126765-01)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (1F32GM126765, F32 GM126765)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- gene duplication, ancestral sequence reconstruction, two-component systems, protein-protein interaction specificity, crosstalk, Alphaproteobacteria, bacterial signal transduction
- MeSH terms
- Mutation, Phylogeny, Signal Transduction, Evolution, Molecular, Gene Duplication, Alphaproteobacteria
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review