The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An in-silico study of the mutation-associated effects on the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, Omicron variant
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pone.0266844
Abstract
The emergence of Omicron (B.1.1.529), a new Variant of Concern in the COVID-19 outbreak, while accompanied by the ongoing Delta variant infection, has once again fueled fears of a new infection wave and global health concern. In the Omicron variant, the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of its spike glycoprotein is heavily mutated, a feature critical for the transmission rate of the virus by interacting with hACE2. In this study, we used a combination of conventional and advanced neural network-based in silico approaches to predict how these mutations would affect the spike protein. The results demonstrated a decrease in the electrostatic potentials of residues corresponding to receptor recognition sites, an increase in the alkalinity of the protein, a change in hydrophobicity, variations in functional residues, and an increase in the percentage of alpha-helix structure. Our next step was to predict the structural changes of the spike protein using the AI-based tool Alphafold2 and dock it with hACE2. The results revealed that the RBD of the Omicron variant had a higher affinity than the reference. Moreover, all-atom molecular dynamics simulations concluded that the RBD of the Omicron variant exhibits a more dispersed interaction network since mutations resulted in an increased number of hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonds with hACE2 compared to the reference RBD. In summary, our current study highlighted the potential structural basis for the enhanced transmissibility and pathogenicity of the Omicron variant, although further research is needed to investigate its epidemiological and biological implications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
VMD: visual molecular dynamics
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A., & Schulten, K. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Graphics · doi:10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 · Cited by 66,952
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free
Van Der Spoel, D., Lindahl, E., Hess, B., Groenhof, G., Mark, A. E., & Berendsen, H. J. C. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20291 · Cited by 19,182
EMBOSS: the European molecular biology open software suite.
Rice, P., Longden, I., & Bleasby, A. (2000) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02024-2 · Cited by 9,466
UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021
The UniProt Consortium, Bateman, A., Martin, M.-J., Orchard, S., Magrane, M., Agivetova, R., Ahmad, S., Alpi, E., Bowler-Barnett, E. H., Britto, R., et al. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa1100 · Cited by 6,372
TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score
Zhang, Y. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki524 · Cited by 3,774
SARS-CoV-2 variants, spike mutations and immune escape
Harvey, W. T., Carabelli, A. M., Jackson, B., Gupta, R. K., Thomson, E. C., Harrison, E. M., Ludden, C., Reeve, R., Rambaut, A., COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) Consortium, et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-021-00573-0 · Cited by 3,528
The ClusPro web server for protein–protein docking
Kozakov, D., Hall, D. R., Xia, B., Porter, K. A., Padhorny, D., Yueh, C., Beglov, D., & Vajda, S. (2017) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2016.169 · Cited by 3,310
Ashkenazy, H., Abadi, S., Martz, E., Chay, O., Mayrose, I., Pupko, T., & Ben-Tal, N. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw408 · Cited by 3,163
PROVEAN web server: a tool to predict the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels
Choi, Y., & Chan, A. P.-Y. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv195 · Cited by 2,560
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- GISAID, 2020, GISAID Initiative, Adv. Virus Res, 2008, 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Shishir, T. A., Jannat, T., & Naser, I. B.
- Affiliations
- BRAC University (BD)
- Corresponding author
- Naser, Iftekhar Bin
- Venue
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-02-23
- OpenAlex
- W4214775475
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Keywords
- Omicron variant, spike protein, receptor binding domain, genetic mutations, hACE2, protein-protein docking, electrostatic potential, hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen bonding, protein structure prediction, AlphaFold2, molecular dynamics simulation, viral transmissibility, COVID-19 pandemic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An in-silico study of the mutation-associated effects on the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, Omicron variant. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/2022.02.21.481269
- The paper
- Shishir, T. A., Jannat, T., & Naser, I. B. (2022). An in-silico study of the mutation-associated effects on the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, Omicron variant. bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory). https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.21.481269
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.