Predicting the pathogenicity of missense variants using features derived from AlphaFold2
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad280 · Paper page
Abstract
Each individual genome harbors multiple missense variants, which can be systematically identified via genome or exome sequencing. This class of genetic variation can alter the functional properties of the respective protein, and thereby lead to clinically relevant phenotypes, such as cancer or Mendelian diseases. Despite advances in computational prediction scores, the classification of missense variants as clinically significant or benign remains a major challenge. Recently, the structure of the human proteome was derived with unprecedented accuracy using the artificial intelligence system AlphaFold2. However, the question of whether AlphaFold2 structures can improve the accuracy of computational pathogenicity prediction for missense variants remains unclear. To address this, we first engineered a set of features for each amino acid from these structures. We then trained a random forest to distinguish between proxy-benign and proxy-pathogenic missense variants derived from gnomAD. This yielded a novel AlphaFold2-based pathogenicity prediction score, termed AlphScore. Important feature classes used by AlphScore are solvent accessibility, amino acid network related features, features describing the physicochemical environment, and AlphaFold2’s quality parameter (pLDDT). AlphScore alone showed lower performance than existing scores, such as CADD or REVEL. However, when AlphScore was added to those scores, the performance always increased, as measured by the approximation of deep mutational scan data, as well as the prediction of expert-curated missense variants from the ClinVar database. Overall, our data indicate that the integration of AlphaFold2 predicted structures can improve pathogenicity prediction of missense variants.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
AlphaFold and Implications for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
Ruff, K. M., & Pappu, R. V. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167208 · Cited by 635 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Novel machine learning approaches revolutionize protein knowledge
Bordin, N., Dallago, C., Heinzinger, M., Kim, S., Littmann, M., Rauer, C., Steinegger, M., Rost, B., & Orengo, C. (2023) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2022.11.001 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schmidt, A., Röner, S., Mai, K., Klinkhammer, H., Kircher, M., & Ludwig, K. U.
- Affiliations
- University of Bonn (DE)
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schmidt, Axel
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-03-05
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10203375
- OpenAlex
- W4366605966
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 15.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (LU 1944/3‐1)
- Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn (O-149.0134)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- missense mutations, pathogenicity prediction, AlphaFold2, protein structure, random forest, solvent accessibility, deep mutational scanning, ClinVar, monogenic disorders, gnomAD, CADD, REVEL, feature engineering
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Mutation, Virulence, Computational Biology, Mutation, Missense
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review