PreprintCited by 281Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsEnzyme Structure and Function

State-of-the-art estimation of protein model accuracy using AlphaFold

Open access
Roney, James P., Ovchinnikov, Sergey·2022·Physical Review Letters

Preprint — published as 10.1103/physrevlett.129.238101 · Paper page

Abstract

The problem of predicting a protein’s 3D structure from its primary amino acid sequence is a longstanding challenge in structural biology. Recently, approaches like AlphaFold have achieved remarkable performance on this task by combining deep learning techniques with coevolutionary data from multiple sequence alignments of related protein sequences. The use of coevolutionary information is critical to these models’ accuracy, and without it their predictive performance drops considerably. In living cells, however, the 3D structure of a protein is fully determined by its primary sequence and the biophysical laws that cause it to fold into a low-energy configuration. Thus, it should be possible to predict a protein’s structure from only its primary sequence by learning a highly-accurate biophysical energy function. We provide evidence that AlphaFold has learned such an energy function, and uses coevolution data to solve the global search problem of finding a low-energy conformation. We demonstrate that AlphaFold’s learned potential function can be used to rank the quality of candidate protein structures with state-of-the-art accuracy, without using any coevolution data. Finally, we explore several applications of this potential function, including the prediction of protein structures without MSAs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.03.11.484043

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 281

Authors
Roney, J. P., & Ovchinnikov, S.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Ovchinnikov, Sergey
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-03-12
Volume
129
Issue
23
Pages
238101-238101
ISSN
0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4310159409
Cited by
281
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 25
FWCI
19.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2032259)
  • Simons Foundation (735929LPI)
  • National Institutes of Health (DP5OD026389)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
AlphaFold, protein structure prediction, protein folding, multiple sequence alignment, protein 3D structure, deep learning
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Amino Acid Sequence, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review