PreprintCited by 7Cellular transport and secretionEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and DiseaseRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Proteomics identifies substrates and a novel component in hSnd2-dependent ER protein targeting

Open access
Tirincsi, Andrea, O’Keefe, Sarah, Nguyen, Duy, Sicking, Mark, Dudek, Johanna, Förster, Friedrich, Jung, Martin, Hadzibeganovic, Drazena +4 more·2022·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Preprint — published as 10.3390/cells11182925 · Paper page

Abstract

SUMMARY: Protein import into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is essential for about 30% of the human proteome. It involves targeting of precursor proteins to the ER and insertion into or translocation across the ER membrane. Furthermore, it relies on signals in the precursor polypeptides and components, which read the signals and facilitate their targeting to a protein-conducting channel in the ER membrane, the Sec61 complex. Compared to the SRP- and TRC-dependent pathways, little is known about the SRP-independent/SND pathway. Our aim was to identify additional components and characterize the client spectrum of the human SND pathway. The established strategy of combining depletion of the central hSnd2-component from HeLa cells with proteomic- and differential protein abundance-analysis was used. The SRP and TRC targeting pathways were analyzed in comparison. TMEM109 was characterized as hSnd3. Unlike SRP but similar to TRC, the SND clients are predominantly membrane proteins with N-terminal, central, or C-terminal targeting signals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.04.27.489649

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Tirincsi, A., O’Keefe, S., Nguyen, D., Sicking, M., Dudek, J., Förster, F., Jung, M., Hadzibeganovic, D., Helms, V., High, S., Zimmermann, R., & Lang, S.
Affiliations
  • Saarland University (DE)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
  • Zimmermann, Richard
  • Lang, Sven
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-04-27
OpenAlex
W4225140264
Cited by
7
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
  • Publications of the UdS (Saarland University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (204957/Z/16/Z)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 894, ZI 234/13-1, IRTG 1830, FO716/4-1, HE3875/15-1, 204957/Z/16/Z)
  • Universität des Saarlandes
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
Sec61, client proteins, HeLa cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review