PreprintCited by 215Plant Pathogens and Fungal DiseasesPlant Disease Resistance and GeneticsProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative computational structural genomics highlights divergent evolution of fungal effectors

Open access
Seong, Kyungyong, Krasileva, Ksenia V·2022·Nature Microbiology

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41564-022-01287-6

Abstract

Elucidating the evolution of pathogen effector molecules is critical to understand infection mechanisms of fungal phytopathogens and ensure crop security. However, rapid diversification that diminishes sequence similarities between homologous effectors has largely concealed the roots of effector evolution. We predicted the folds of 26,653 secreted proteins from 21 species with AlphaFold and performed structure-guided comparative analyses on two aspects of effector evolution: uniquely expanded effector families and common folds present across the fungal species. Extreme expansion of nearly lineage-specific effector families was found only in several obligate biotrophs, Blumeria graminis and Puccinia graminis . The highly expanded effector families were the source of conserved sequence motifs, such as the Y/F/WxC motif. We identified additional lineage-specific effector families that include known (a)virulence factors, such as AvrSr35, AvrSr50 and Tin2. These families represented new classes of sequence-unrelated structurally similar effectors. Structural comparisons revealed that the expanded structural folds further diversify through domain duplications and fusion with disordered stretches. Sub-and neo-functionalized structurally similar effectors reconverge on regulation, expanding the functional pools of effectors in the pathogen infection cycle. We also found evidence that many effector families could have originated from ancestral folds that have been conserved across fungi. Collectively, our study highlights diverse mechanisms of effector evolution and supports divergent evolution of effectors that leads to emergence of pathogen virulence from ancestral proteins.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.05.02.490317

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 81

  1. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002230 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/s10658-020-02033-6 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/mpp.12609 · DOI
  4. 10.1371/journal.pone.0213712 · DOI
  5. 10.1094/MPMI-03-18-0055-A · DOI
  6. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.7554/eLife.66961 · DOI
  8. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003866 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s00239-001-2309-6 · DOI
  10. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1126/science.aao4810 · DOI
  12. 10.7554/eLife.32110 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/s41598-017-01100-z · DOI
  14. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005228 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/s41477-018-0194-x · DOI
  16. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003088 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00783.x · DOI
  18. 10.1038/nature03449 · DOI
  19. 10.1128/mSphere.00231-18 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/nph.14733 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.05.028 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1186/gb-2008-9-5-r77 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/nar/gkt1240 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1128/MMBR.00066-16 · DOI
  25. 10.1186/s12864-018-4750-6 · DOI
  26. 10.1186/1471-2164-11-317 · DOI
  27. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002070 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/nar/gkt1183 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1073/pnas.1810705115 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/nature08358 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.simyco.2020.01.003 · DOI
  32. 10.1099/mgen.0.000637 · DOI
  33. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143436 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/nature05248 · DOI
  35. 10.1093/molbev/msy072 · DOI
  36. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02575 · DOI
  37. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002137 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00971-3 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1128/genomeA.00409-13 · DOI
  40. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1105/tpc.17.00764 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.33 · DOI
  43. 10.1186/s12915-020-00818-z · DOI
  44. 10.1101/2020.12.17.423041 · DOI
  45. 10.1038/s41467-019-12927-7 · DOI
  46. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-043014-114623 · DOI
  47. 10.1038/s41467-018-04149-0 · DOI
  48. 10.1534/g3.112.004044 · DOI
  49. 10.1105/tpc.113.116319 · DOI
  50. 10.1093/nar/gky384 · DOI
  51. 10.1093/nar/gkaa913 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.3389/fpls.2014.00098 · DOI
  53. 10.1111/nph.18011 · DOI
  54. 10.1105/tpc.16.00435 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.pbi.2022.102210 · DOI
  56. 10.1186/1471-2164-13-694 · DOI
  57. 10.1093/nar/gki442 · DOI
  58. 10.1101/2022.03.22.482717 · DOI
  59. 10.1038/ncomms1189 · DOI
  60. 10.1105/tpc.105.034918 · DOI
  61. 10.1371/journal.pone.0029847 · DOI
  62. 10.7554/eLife.44471 · DOI
  63. 10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1094/MPMI-03-21-0071-R · DOI
  65. 10.1007/s11557-019-01486-2 · DOI
  66. 10.1093/nar/gky1097 · DOI
  67. 10.1111/nph.14386 · DOI
  68. 10.1094/MPMI-08-21-0201-R · DOI
  69. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004806 · DOI
  70. 10.3389/fpls.2015.01168 · DOI
  71. 10.1073/pnas.1003391107 · DOI
  72. 10.1186/s12859-019-3019-7 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.112408.132637 · DOI
  74. 10.7554/eLife.01355 · DOI
  75. 10.1038/s41564-018-0304-6 · DOI
  76. 10.1105/tpc.107.053611 · DOI
  77. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.12.010 · DOI
  78. 10.1186/s12864-016-2690-6 · DOI
  79. 10.1101/2021.12.14.472499 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.3389/fpls.2018.01294 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Seong, K., & Krasileva, K. V.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Krasileva, Ksenia V
Venue
Nature Microbiology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-05-02
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
174-187
ISSN
2058-5276 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313557127
Cited by
215
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 8
FWCI
29.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Nature Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  • Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research (CA19-SS-0000000046)
  • Innovative Genomics Institute
  • National Institutes of Health (4dp2at011967-02)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (DP2 AT011967)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
fungal phytopathogens, effector proteins, effector evolution, secreted proteins, structure prediction, AlphaFold, Blumeria graminis, Puccinia graminis, domain duplication, domain fusion, subfunctionalization, neofunctionalization, oomycete effectors
MeSH terms
Fungal Proteins, Humans, Conserved Sequence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review