The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative computational structural genomics highlights divergent evolution of fungal effectors
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41564-022-01287-6
Abstract
Elucidating the evolution of pathogen effector molecules is critical to understand infection mechanisms of fungal phytopathogens and ensure crop security. However, rapid diversification that diminishes sequence similarities between homologous effectors has largely concealed the roots of effector evolution. We predicted the folds of 26,653 secreted proteins from 21 species with AlphaFold and performed structure-guided comparative analyses on two aspects of effector evolution: uniquely expanded effector families and common folds present across the fungal species. Extreme expansion of nearly lineage-specific effector families was found only in several obligate biotrophs, Blumeria graminis and Puccinia graminis . The highly expanded effector families were the source of conserved sequence motifs, such as the Y/F/WxC motif. We identified additional lineage-specific effector families that include known (a)virulence factors, such as AvrSr35, AvrSr50 and Tin2. These families represented new classes of sequence-unrelated structurally similar effectors. Structural comparisons revealed that the expanded structural folds further diversify through domain duplications and fusion with disordered stretches. Sub-and neo-functionalized structurally similar effectors reconverge on regulation, expanding the functional pools of effectors in the pathogen infection cycle. We also found evidence that many effector families could have originated from ancestral folds that have been conserved across fungi. Collectively, our study highlights diverse mechanisms of effector evolution and supports divergent evolution of effectors that leads to emergence of pathogen virulence from ancestral proteins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 81
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002230 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10658-020-02033-6 · DOI
- 10.1111/mpp.12609 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0213712 · DOI
- 10.1094/MPMI-03-18-0055-A · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7554/eLife.66961 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003866 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00239-001-2309-6 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aao4810 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.32110 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-017-01100-z · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005228 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41477-018-0194-x · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003088 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00783.x · DOI
- 10.1038/nature03449 · DOI
- 10.1128/mSphere.00231-18 · DOI
- 10.1111/nph.14733 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.05.028 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/gb-2008-9-5-r77 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkt1240 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/MMBR.00066-16 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12864-018-4750-6 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2164-11-317 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002070 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkt1183 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1810705115 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature08358 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.simyco.2020.01.003 · DOI
- 10.1099/mgen.0.000637 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143436 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature05248 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msy072 · DOI
- 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02575 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002137 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00971-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/genomeA.00409-13 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1105/tpc.17.00764 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.33 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12915-020-00818-z · DOI
- 10.1101/2020.12.17.423041 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-019-12927-7 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-arplant-043014-114623 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-018-04149-0 · DOI
- 10.1534/g3.112.004044 · DOI
- 10.1105/tpc.113.116319 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gky384 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa913 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fpls.2014.00098 · DOI
- 10.1111/nph.18011 · DOI
- 10.1105/tpc.16.00435 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pbi.2022.102210 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2164-13-694 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gki442 · DOI
- 10.1101/2022.03.22.482717 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms1189 · DOI
- 10.1105/tpc.105.034918 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0029847 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.44471 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1094/MPMI-03-21-0071-R · DOI
- 10.1007/s11557-019-01486-2 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gky1097 · DOI
- 10.1111/nph.14386 · DOI
- 10.1094/MPMI-08-21-0201-R · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004806 · DOI
- 10.3389/fpls.2015.01168 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1003391107 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12859-019-3019-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.phyto.112408.132637 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.01355 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41564-018-0304-6 · DOI
- 10.1105/tpc.107.053611 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.12.010 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12864-016-2690-6 · DOI
- 10.1101/2021.12.14.472499 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fpls.2018.01294 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Seong, K., & Krasileva, K. V.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Krasileva, Ksenia V
- Venue
- Nature Microbiology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-05-02
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 174-187
- ISSN
- 2058-5276 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9816061
- OpenAlex
- W4313557127
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 8
- FWCI
- 29.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Nature Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
- Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research (CA19-SS-0000000046)
- Innovative Genomics Institute
- National Institutes of Health (4dp2at011967-02)
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (DP2 AT011967)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- fungal phytopathogens, effector proteins, effector evolution, secreted proteins, structure prediction, AlphaFold, Blumeria graminis, Puccinia graminis, domain duplication, domain fusion, subfunctionalization, neofunctionalization, oomycete effectors
- MeSH terms
- Fungal Proteins, Humans, Conserved Sequence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review