PreprintCited by 103Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

AlphaFold2 reveals commonalities and novelties in protein structure space for 21 model organisms

Open access
Bordin, Nicola, Sillitoe, Ian, Nallapareddy, Vamsi, Rauer, Clemens, Lam, Su Datt, Waman, Vaishali P., Sen, Neeladri, Heinzinger, Michael +6 more·2022·Communications Biology

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s42003-023-04488-9 · Paper page

Abstract

Over the last year, there have been substantial improvements in protein structure prediction, particularly in methods like DeepMind’s AlphaFold2 (AF2) that exploit deep learning strategies. Here we report a new CATH-Assign protocol which is used to analyse the first tranche of AF2 models predicted for 21 model organisms and discuss insights these models bring on the nature of protein structure space. We analyse good quality models and those with no unusual structural characteristics, i.e., features rarely seen in experimental structures. For the ∼370,000 models that meet these criteria, we observe that 92% can be assigned to evolutionary superfamilies in CATH. The remaining domains cluster into 2,367 putative novel superfamilies. Detailed manual analysis on a subset of 618 of those which had at least one human relative revealed some extremely remote homologies and some further unusual features, but 26 could be confirmed as novel superfamilies and one of these has an alpha-beta propeller architectural arrangement never seen before. By clustering both experimental and predicted AF2 domain structures into distinct ‘global fold’ groups, we observe that the new AF2 models in CATH increase information on structural diversity by 36%. This expansion in structural diversity will help to reveal associated functional diversity not previously detected. Our novel CATH-Assign protocol scales well and will be able to harness the huge expansion (at least 100 million models) in structural data promised by DeepMind to provide more comprehensive coverage of even the most diverse superfamilies to help rationalise evolutionary changes in their functions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.06.02.494367

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bordin, N., Sillitoe, I., Nallapareddy, V., Rauer, C., Lam, S. D., Waman, V. P., Sen, N., Heinzinger, M., Littmann, M., Kim, S., Velankar, S., Steinegger, M., Rost, B., & Orengo, C.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology (GB)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Orengo, Christine
Venue
Communications Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-06-03
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
160-160
ISSN
2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319593844
Cited by
103
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 10
FWCI
8.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
  • Wellcome Trust (BB/R014892/1, 221327/Z/20/Z, 221327, BB/T002735/1)
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory
  • DeepMind
  • National Research Foundation (2019R1A6A1A10073437, 2021-R1C1-C102065)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG-GZ: RO1320/4-1, RO1320/4‐1)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01IS17049)
  • Seoul National University
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (2021-R1C1-C102065, 2021-M3A9-I4021220, 2020M3‐A9G7‐103933, 2019R1-A6A1-A10073437)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/R014892/1, BB/R009597/1, BB/V014722/1, BB/S020039/1, BB/T002735/1, 221327/Z/20/Z, BB/S020144/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
AlphaFold2, protein structure prediction, model organisms, remote homology, protein fold evolution, structure-function relationship
MeSH terms
Furylfuramide, Humans, Proteins, Databases, Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review