PreprintCited by 33Evolution and Genetic DynamicsRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsPhilosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Epistasis between promoter activity and coding mutations shapes gene evolvability

Open access
Cisneros, Angel F., Gagnon-Arsenault, Isabelle, Dubé, Alexandre K., Després, Philippe C., Kumar, Pradum, Lafontaine, Kiana, Pelletier, Joelle N., Landry, Christian R.·2022·Science Advances

Preprint — published as 10.1126/sciadv.add9109 · Paper page

Abstract

Summary: The evolution of protein-coding genes proceeds as mutations act on two main dimensions: regulation of transcription level and the coding sequence. The extent and impact of the connection between these two dimensions are largely unknown because they have generally been studied independently. By measuring the fitness effects of all possible mutations on a protein complex at various levels of promoter activity, we show that expression at the optimal level for the WT protein masks the effects of both deleterious and beneficial coding mutations. Mutants that are deleterious at low expression but masked at optimal expression are slightly destabilizing for individual subunits and binding interfaces. Coding mutations that increase protein abundance are beneficial at low expression but incur a fitness cost at high expression. We thereby demonstrate that expression level can dictate which coding mutations are beneficial or deleterious.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.06.07.495002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. 10.1038/nrg3744 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.tree.2018.10.009 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.tig.2011.05.007 · DOI
  4. 10.1126/science.1123539 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/molbev/msp151 · DOI
  6. 1995, A plasmid-encoded dihydrofolate reductase from trimethoprim-resistant bacteria has a novel D2-symmetric active site, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol, 2, 1018, 10.1038/nsb1195-1018 · DOI
  7. 10.1021/bi701532r · DOI
  8. 10.1002/cbic.200400237 · DOI
  9. 9. M. Faltyn , B. Alcock , A. McArthur , Evolution and nomenclature of the trimethoprim resistant dihydrofolate (dfr) reductases (2019) (available at https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/201905.0137).
  10. 10.1056/NEJM199402033300507 · DOI
  11. 2019, GEMME: A Simple and Fast Global Epistatic Model Predicting Mutational Effects, Mol. Biol. Evol, 36, 2604, 10.1093/molbev/msz179 · DOI
  12. 10.1021/bi1005943 · DOI
  13. 10.1021/bi00109a013 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/protein/gzh090 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/s41467-019-13810-1 · DOI
  16. 10.1021/bi0110544 · DOI
  17. M. Mirdita , K. Schütze , Y. Moriwaki , L. Heo , S. Ovchinnikov , M. Steinegger , ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat. Methods (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  18. 2021, Differentiation of the binding of two ligands to a tetrameric protein with a single symmetric active site by 19 F NMR, Protein Sci, 30, 477, 10.1002/pro.4007 · DOI
  19. 10.1023/A:1010933404324 · DOI · Paper page
  20. E. Gasteiger , C. Hoogland , A. Gattiker , S. Duvaud , M. R. Wilkins , R. D. Appel , A. Bairoch , in The Proteomics Protocols Handbook, J. M. Walker , Ed. (Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, 2005), pp. 571– 607. · DOI
  21. 10.1073/pnas.1209312109 · DOI
  22. 2022, Expression level is a major modifier of the fitness landscape of a protein coding gene, Nature Ecology & Evolution, 6, 103
  23. S. Bhattacharyya , S. Bershtein , J. Yan , T. Argun , A. I. Gilson , S. A. Trauger , E. I. Shakhnovich , Transient protein-protein interactions perturb E. coli metabolome and cause gene dosage toxicity. Elife. 5, e20309 (2016). · DOI
  24. 10.1073/pnas.0504070102 · DOI · Paper page
  25. J.-F. Gout , D. Kahn , L. Duret , Paramecium Post-Genomics Consortium, The relationship among gene expression, the evolution of gene dosage, and the rate of protein evolution. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000944 (2010). · DOI
  26. 10.1016/B978-0-12-418687-3.00028-8 · DOI
  27. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, 2× YT Medium (2014). · DOI
  28. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, LB (Luria-Bertani) liquid medium (2006). · DOI
  29. 10.1128/jb.177.14.4121-4130.1995 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06509.x · DOI
  31. 10.1038/nmeth.1318 · DOI
  32. 10.1021/bi901947r · DOI
  33. N. Yachie , E. Petsalaki , J. C. Mellor , J. Weile , Y. Jacob , M. Verby , S. B. Ozturk , S. Li , A. G. Cote , R. Mosca , J. J. Knapp , M. Ko , A. Yu , M. Gebbia , N. Sahni , S. Yi , T. Tyagi , D. Sheykhkarimli , J. F. Roth , C. Wong , L. Musa , J. Snider , Y.-C. Liu , H. Yu , P. Braun , I. Stagljar , T. Hao , M. A. Calderwood , L. Pelletier , P. Aloy , D. E. Hill , M. Vidal , F. P. Roth , Pooledlmatrix protein interaction screens using Barcode Fusion Genetics. Mol. Syst. Biol. 12, 863 (2016). · DOI
  34. 2018, Boosting the efficiency of site-saturation mutagenesis for a difficult-to-randomize gene by a two-step PCR strategy, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol, 102, 6095, 10.1007/s00253-018-9041-2 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/s41467-021-21873-2 · DOI
  36. K. Sprouffske , A. Wagner , Growthcurver: an R package for obtaining interpretable metrics from microbial growth curves. BMC Bioinformatics. 17, 172 (2016). · DOI
  37. 10.1038/188231a0 · DOI
  38. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 · DOI · Paper page
  39. B. Langmead , C. Trapnell , M. Pop , S. L. Salzberg , Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  40. A. P. Masella , A. K. Bartram , J. M. Truszkowski , D. G. Brown , J. D. Neufeld , PANDAseq: paired-end assembler for illumina sequences. BMC Bioinformatics. 13, 31 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  41. T. Rognes , T. Flouri , B. Nichols , C. Quince , F. Mahé , VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ. 4, e2584 (2016). · DOI
  42. 10.1261/rna.294907 · DOI
  43. 10.1074/jbc.M114.606632 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 2017, Integron-Associated DfrB4, a Previously Uncharacterized Member of the Trimethoprim-Resistant Dihydrofolate Reductase B Family, Is a Clinically Identified Emergent Source of Antibiotic Resistance, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother, 61, e02665
  45. L. S. Johnson , S. R. Eddy , E. Portugaly , Hidden Markov model speed heuristic and iterative HMM search procedure. BMC Bioinformatics. 11, 431 (2010). · DOI
  46. 10.1093/nar/gkf436 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1093/molbev/mst010 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1093/bioinformatics/7.4.479 · DOI
  49. 10.1093/bioinformatics/9.3.361 · DOI
  50. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu336 · DOI
  51. 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90038-6 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00442-4 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1093/nar/gki387 · DOI · Paper page
  55. M. Tiberti , T. Terkelsen , K. Degn , L. Beltrame , T. C. Cremers , I. da Piedade , M. Di Marco , E. Maiani , E. Papaleo , MutateX: an automated pipeline for in silico saturation mutagenesis of protein structures and structural ensembles. Brief. Bioinform. 23, bbac074 (2022). · DOI
  56. 10.1524/auto.2011.0951 · DOI
  57. 61. M. Murray , J. Blume , FDRestimation: Estimate, Plot, and Summarize False Discovery Rates (2020), (available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=FDRestimation). · DOI
  58. 2011, The Aligned Rank Transform for Nonparametric Factorial Analyses Using Only ANOVA Procedures, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI, 11, 143
  59. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4051 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Cisneros, A. F., Gagnon-Arsenault, I., Dubé, A. K., Després, P. C., Kumar, P., Lafontaine, K., Pelletier, J. N., & Landry, C. R.
Affiliations
  • PROTEO (CA)
  • Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IN)
Corresponding author
Landry, Christian R.
Venue
Science Advances
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-06-08
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
eadd9109-eadd9109
ISSN
2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319069458
Cited by
33
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
5.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (387697)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-N-2018-04686, 2018-04686)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
Keywords
epistasis, promoter activity, coding mutations, transcriptional regulation, protein complex evolution, protein stability, binding interface, protein abundance, fitness effects of mutations, deleterious mutations, beneficial mutations
MeSH terms
Biochemical Phenomena, Epistasis, Genetic, Mutation, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review