PreprintCited by 192Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Direct Generation of Protein Conformational Ensembles via Machine Learning

Open access
Janson, Giacomo, Valdes-Garcia, Gilberto, Heo, Lim, Feig, Michael·2022·Nature Communications

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-023-36443-x · Paper page

Abstract

Dynamics and conformational sampling are essential for linking protein structure to biological function. While challenging to probe experimentally, computer simulations are widely used to describe protein dynamics, but at significant computational costs that continue to limit the systems that can be studied. Here, we demonstrate that machine learning can be trained with simulation data to directly generate physically realistic conformational ensembles of proteins without the need for any sampling and at negligible computational cost. As a proof-of-principle a generative adversarial network based on a transformer architecture with self-attention was trained on coarse-grained simulations of intrinsically disordered peptides. The resulting model, idpGAN, can predict sequence-dependent ensembles for any sequence demonstrating that transferability can be achieved beyond the limited training data. idpGAN was also retrained on atomistic simulation data to show that the approach can be extended in principle to higher-resolution conformational ensemble generation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.06.18.496675

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100749 · DOI
  2. 10.1126/science.abd3623 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.tibs.2018.11.007 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/nature04105 · DOI
  5. Gupta, A. et al. Experimental techniques to study protein dynamics and conformations in: Advances in Protein Molecular and Structural Biology Methods (eds Timir Tripathi & Vikash Kumar Dubey ) 181–197 (Academic Press, 2022). · DOI
  6. 10.1146/annurev-biophys-042910-155245 · DOI
  7. Shaw, D. E. et al. Anton 2: Raising the Bar for Performance and Programmability in a Special-Purpose Molecular Dynamics Supercomputer in: SC ‘14: Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis. 41–53 (2014).
  8. 10.3390/e16010163 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2021.04.005 · DOI
  10. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1002/prot.26171 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1042/BST20210499 · DOI
  13. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-072711-164947 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1038/s41467-017-02388-1 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/s43588-021-00173-1 · DOI
  16. 10.1063/5.0026133 · DOI
  17. 10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3116668 · DOI
  18. Ramesh, A. et al. Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generation in: International Conference on Machine Learning. 8821–8831 (PMLR, 2021). <https://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/ramesh21a.html>.
  19. Oord, A. et al. Parallel WaveNet: Fast High-Fidelity Speech Synthesis in: International Conference on Machine Learning. 3918–3926 (PMLR, 2018). <https://proceedings.mlr.press/v80/oord18a.html>.
  20. 10.1146/annurev-physchem-042018-052331 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Noé, F. Machine Learning for Molecular Dynamics on Long Timescales in: Machine Learning Meets Quantum Physics (eds Kristof T. Schütt et al. ) 331–372 (Springer International Publishing, 2020). · DOI
  22. Xu, M. , Luo, S. , Bengio, Y. , Peng, J. & Tang, J. Learning Neural Generative Dynamics for Molecular Conformation Generation in: International Conference on Learning Representations. (2021). <https://openreview.net/forum?id=pAbm1qfheGk>.
  23. 2021, E(n) Equivariant Normalizing Flows, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst, 34, 4181
  24. Simm, G. & Hernandez-Lobato, J. M. A Generative Model for Molecular Distance Geometry in: International Conference on Machine Learning. 8949–8958 (PMLR, 2020). <https://proceedings.mlr.press/v119/simm20a.html>.
  25. 10.1126/science.aaw1147 · DOI
  26. 2021, Biophysical studies of phase separation integrating experimental and computational methods, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol, 70, 78, 10.1016/j.sbi.2021.04.004 · DOI
  27. Goodfellow, I. et al. Generative Adversarial Nets. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 27 (2014).
  28. 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.08.023 · DOI
  29. Vaswani, A. et al. Attention is all you need. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 30 (2017).
  30. 2018, Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks, arXiv preprint
  31. Wang, T.-C. et al. High-resolution image synthesis and semantic manipulation with conditional gans in: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 8798–8807 (2018). · DOI
  32. 2016, Generative multi-adversarial networks, arXiv preprint
  33. 10.1093/nar/gkab1082 · DOI
  34. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx789 · DOI
  35. 2021, Inferring a continuous distribution of atom coordinates from cryo-EM images using VAEs, arXiv preprint
  36. 2019, Markov models of molecular kinetics, J. Chem. Phys, 151, 190401, 10.1063/1.5134029 · DOI
  37. Miyato, T. , Kataoka, T. , Koyama, M. & Yoshida, Y. Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networks in: International Conference on Learning Representations. (2018). <https://openreview.net/forum?id=B1QRgziT->.
  38. Esser, P. , Rombach, R. & Ommer, B. Taming transformers for high-resolution image synthesis in: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 12873–12883.
  39. Dhariwal, P. & Nichol, A. Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 34 (2021).
  40. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.7554/eLife.64004 · DOI
  42. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005659 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1016/j.jmgm.2003.12.005 · DOI
  44. 10.1002/jcc.21287 · DOI
  45. 2016, Nips 2016 tutorial: Generative adversarial networks, arXiv preprint
  46. Isola, P. , Zhu, J.-Y. , Zhou, T. & Efros, A. A. Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networks in: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). 5967–5976 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  47. 2020, Your GAN is secretly an energy-based model and you should use discriminator driven latent sampling, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst, 33, 12275
  48. 2019, PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst, 32, 8024
  49. Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization in: International Conference for Learning Representations. (2015). <https://openreview.net/forum?id=8gmWwjFyLj>.
  50. 10.1038/s41580-021-00407-0 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Gulrajani, I. , Ahmed, F. , Arjovsky, M. , Dumoulin, V. & Courville, A. C. Improved training of wasserstein gans. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 30 (2017).

Metadata

Authors
Janson, G., Valdes-Garcia, G., Heo, L., & Feig, M.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Feig, Michael
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-06-19
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
774-774
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4320040108
Cited by
192
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 2
FWCI
16.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (R35 GM126948)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM126948)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
Keywords
protein conformational ensembles, generative adversarial networks, transformer models, self-attention, intrinsically disordered peptides, coarse-grained simulation, atomistic simulation, transferability, protein dynamics
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Peptides, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review