PreprintCited by 4Protein Structure and DynamicsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhanced conformational exploration of protein loops using a global parameterization of the backbone geometry

Open access
O’Donnell, Timothée, Cazals, Frédéric·2022·Journal of Computational Chemistry

Preprint — published as 10.1002/jcc.27067

Abstract

Flexible loops are paramount to protein functions, with action modes ranging from localized dynamics contributing to the free energy of the system, to large amplitude conformational changes accounting for the repositioning whole secondary structure elements or protein domains. However, generating diverse and low energy loops remains a difficult problem. This work introduces a novel paradigm to sample loop conformations, in the spirit of the Hit-and- Run (HAR) Markov chain Monte Carlo technique. The algorithm uses a decomposition of the loop into tripeptides, and a novel characterization of necessary conditions for Tripeptide Loop Closure to admit solutions. Denoting m the number of tripeptides, the algorithm works in an angular space of dimension 12m. In this space, the hyper-surfaces associated with the aforementioned necessary conditions are used to run a HAR-like sampling technique. On classical loop cases up to 15 amino acids, our parameter free method compares favorably to previous work, generating more diverse conformational ensembles. We also report experiments on a 30 amino acids long loop, a size not processed in any previous work.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.06.21.497022

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. 10.1016/j.sbi.2010.09.005 · DOI
  2. 2021, Studying dynamics without explicit dynamics: a structure-based study of the export mechanism by AcrB, Proteins: structure, function, and bioinformatics, 89, 259, 10.1002/prot.26012 · DOI
  3. 10.1073/pnas.1218256109 · DOI
  4. 2018, Structure and dynamics of gpcr signaling complexes, Nature structural & molecular biology, 25, 4, 10.1038/s41594-017-0011-7 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 2015, Missing strings of residues in protein crystal structures, Intrinsically disordered proteins, 3, e1095697, 10.1080/21690707.2015.1095697 · DOI
  6. D. J. Wales . Energy Landscapes. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  7. 10.1063/1.2102896 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.str.2005.10.007 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.05.023 · DOI
  10. 10.1021/ma60014a012 · DOI
  11. 1999, Computer algebra methods for studying and computing molecular conformations, Algorithmica, 25, 372
  12. 10.1002/jcc.20021 · DOI
  13. 2005, Probik: Protein backbone motion by inverse kinematics, The International Journal of Robotics Research, 24, 971, 10.1177/0278364905059108 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/jcc.20733 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/00268979300100641 · DOI
  16. 10.1063/1.1542611 · DOI
  17. 2012, Subtle Monte Carlo updates in dense molecular systems, Journal of chemical theory and computation, 8, 695, 10.1021/ct200641m · DOI
  18. 10.1002/jcc.10416 · DOI
  19. Juan Cortés and Thierry Siméon . Sampling-based motion planning under kinematic loop-closure constraints. In Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics VI, pages 75–90. Springer, 2004. · DOI
  20. 2009, Sub-angstrom accuracy in protein loop reconstruction by robotics-inspired conformational sampling, Nature Methods, 6, 551, 10.1038/nmeth0809-551 · DOI
  21. 1986, Using known substructures in protein model building and crystallography, The EMBO journal, 5, 819, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04287.x · DOI
  22. 2005, Inverse kinematics in biology: The protein loop closure problem, The International Journal of Robotics Research, 24, 151, 10.1177/0278364905050352 · DOI
  23. 2022, Tripeptide loop closure: a detailed study of reconstructions based on Ramachandran distributions, Proteins: structure, function, and bioinformatics, 90, 858, 10.1002/prot.26281 · DOI
  24. 10.1371/journal.pone.0063090 · DOI
  25. 2019, A reinforcement-learning-based approach to enhance exhaustive protein loop sampling, Bioinformatics, 36, 1099
  26. 2018, Predicting loop conformational ensembles, Bioinformatics, 34, 949, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx718 · DOI
  27. 2021, Current approaches to flexible loop modeling, Current Research in Structural Biology, 3, 187, 10.1016/j.crstbi.2021.07.002 · DOI
  28. 10.1107/S0108767391001071 · DOI
  29. 1987, Hit-and-run algorithms for the identification of nonredundant linear inequalities, Mathematical Programming, 37, 184, 10.1007/BF02591694 · DOI
  30. T. O’Donnell , V. Agashe , and F. Cazals . Geometric constraints within tripeptides and the existence of tripeptide reconstructions. Technical report, 2022. · DOI
  31. 2016, A practical volume algorithm, Mathematical Programming Computation, 8, 133, 10.1007/s12532-015-0097-z · DOI
  32. Y.T. Lee and S. Vempala . Convergence rate of Riemannian Hamiltonian Monte Carlo and faster polytope volume computation. In STOC, pages 1115–1121. ACM, 2018. · DOI
  33. 2022, Improved polytope volume calculations based on Hamiltonian Monte Carlo with boundary reflections and sweet arithmetics, J. of Computational Geometry, 13, 55
  34. A. Chevallier , F. Cazals , and P. Fearnhead . Efficient computation of the the volume of a polytope in high-dimensions using piecewise deterministic markov processes. In AISTATS, 2022.
  35. 2004, A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 55, 351, 10.1002/prot.10613 · DOI
  36. 2011, Progress in super long loop prediction, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 79, 2920, 10.1002/prot.23129 · DOI
  37. 10.1002/jcb.10195 · DOI
  38. 2012, A highly selective and potent ptp-meg2 inhibitor with therapeutic potential for type 2 diabetes, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 134, 18116, 10.1021/ja308212y · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.01.049 · DOI
  40. 10.1128/JVI.00966-10 · DOI
  41. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  42. T. Lelièvre , G. Stoltz , and M. Rousset . Free energy computations: A mathematical perspective. World Scientific, 2010. · DOI · Paper page
  43. 2015, Enhanced sampling techniques in molecular dynamics simulations of biological systems, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-General Subjects, 1850, 872, 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.10.019 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
O’Donnell, T., & Cazals, F.
Affiliations
Université Côte d'Azur (FR)
Corresponding author
Cazals, Frédéric
Venue
Journal of Computational Chemistry
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-06-25
Volume
44
Issue
11
Pages
1094-1104
ISSN
0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319062611
Cited by
4
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Computational Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-19-P3IA-0002, ANR‐19)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
Keywords
conformational ensembles, protein flexibility
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Amino Acids, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Protein Structure, Secondary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhanced conformational exploration of protein loops using a global parameterization of the backbone geometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/2022.06.21.497022
The paper
O’Donnell, T., & Cazals, F. (2022). Enhanced conformational exploration of protein loops using a global parameterization of the backbone geometry. Journal of Computational Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.21.497022