PreprintCited by 1SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Waning of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced immunity: A systematic review and secondary data analysis

Open access
Menegale, Francesco, Manica, Mattia, Zardini, Agnese, Guzzetta, Giorgio, Marziano, Valentina, d’Andrea, Valeria, Trentini, Filippo, Ajelli, Marco +2 more·2022·medRxiv

Abstract

Background: The emergence of Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of SARS-CoV-2 in late 2021 was followed by a marked increase of breakthrough infections. Estimates of vaccine effectiveness (VE) in the long term are key to assess potential resurgence of COVID-19 cases in the future. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of manuscripts published until June 21, 2022 to identify studies reporting the level of protection provided by COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and symptomatic disease at different time points since vaccine administration. An exponential model was used to perform a secondary data analysis of the retrieved data to estimate the progressive waning of VE associated with different vaccine products, numbers of received doses, and SARS-CoV-2 variants. Findings: Our results show that VE of BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines against any laboratory confirmed infection with Delta might have been lower than 70% at 9 months from second dose administration. We found a marked immune escape associated with Omicron infection and symptomatic disease, both after the administration of two and three doses. The half-life of protection against symptomatic infection provided by two doses was estimated in the range of 178-456 days for Delta, and between 66 and 73 days for Omicron. Booster doses were found to restore the VE to levels comparable to those acquired soon after administration of the second dose; however, a fast decline of booster VE against Omicron was observed, with less than 20% VE against infection and less than 25% VE against symptomatic disease at 9 months from the booster administration. Conclusions: This study provides a cohesive picture of the waning of vaccine protection; obtained estimates can inform the identification of appropriate targets and timing for future COVID-19 vaccination programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.07.04.22277225

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Menegale, F., Manica, M., Zardini, A., Guzzetta, G., Marziano, V., d’Andrea, V., Trentini, F., Ajelli, M., Poletti, P., & Merler, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Trento (IT)
  • Fondazione Bruno Kessler (IT)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Poletti, Piero
Venue
medRxiv
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-07-06
OpenAlex
W4284970205
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
H2020 European Research Council (694160)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 vaccines, vaccine waning, vaccine effectiveness, Omicron variant, Delta variant, breakthrough infection, immune evasion, booster vaccination, BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, vaccination schedule

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review