Waning of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced immunity: A systematic review and secondary data analysis
Open accessAbstract
Background: The emergence of Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of SARS-CoV-2 in late 2021 was followed by a marked increase of breakthrough infections. Estimates of vaccine effectiveness (VE) in the long term are key to assess potential resurgence of COVID-19 cases in the future. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of manuscripts published until June 21, 2022 to identify studies reporting the level of protection provided by COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and symptomatic disease at different time points since vaccine administration. An exponential model was used to perform a secondary data analysis of the retrieved data to estimate the progressive waning of VE associated with different vaccine products, numbers of received doses, and SARS-CoV-2 variants. Findings: Our results show that VE of BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines against any laboratory confirmed infection with Delta might have been lower than 70% at 9 months from second dose administration. We found a marked immune escape associated with Omicron infection and symptomatic disease, both after the administration of two and three doses. The half-life of protection against symptomatic infection provided by two doses was estimated in the range of 178-456 days for Delta, and between 66 and 73 days for Omicron. Booster doses were found to restore the VE to levels comparable to those acquired soon after administration of the second dose; however, a fast decline of booster VE against Omicron was observed, with less than 20% VE against infection and less than 25% VE against symptomatic disease at 9 months from the booster administration. Conclusions: This study provides a cohesive picture of the waning of vaccine protection; obtained estimates can inform the identification of appropriate targets and timing for future COVID-19 vaccination programs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A previous systematic review published in May 2023 showed lower VE estimates and faster waning of protection against Omicron infection.
“A previous systematic review published in May 2023 showed lower VE estimates and faster waning of protection against Omicron infection [5].”
Cites
Tartof, S. Y., Slezak, J. M., Fischer, H., Hong, V., Ackerson, B. K., Ranasinghe, O. N., Frankland, T. B., Ogun, O. A., Zamparo, J. M., Gray, S., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02183-8 · Cited by 1,167 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Oda, Y., Kumagai, Y., Kanai, M., Iwama, Y., Okura, I., Minamida, T., Yagi, Y., Kurosawa, T., Greener, B., Zhang, Y., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(23)00650-3 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
- Authors
- Menegale, F., Manica, M., Zardini, A., Guzzetta, G., Marziano, V., d’Andrea, V., Trentini, F., Ajelli, M., Poletti, P., & Merler, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Trento (IT)
- Fondazione Bruno Kessler (IT)
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Poletti, Piero
- ORCID
- Venue
- medRxiv
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-07-06
- OpenAlex
- W4284970205
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- H2020 European Research Council (694160)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
- Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Keywords
- SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 vaccines, vaccine waning, vaccine effectiveness, Omicron variant, Delta variant, breakthrough infection, immune evasion, booster vaccination, BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, vaccination schedule
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review