PreprintCited by 22Cellular transport and secretionLipid Membrane Structure and BehaviorProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular mechanism of GTP binding- and dimerization-induced enhancement of Sar1-mediated membrane remodeling

Open access
Paul, Sanjoy, Audhya, Anjon, Cui, Qiang·2022·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Preprint — published as 10.1073/pnas.2212513120

Abstract

The Sar1 GTPase initiates Coat Protein II (COPII)-mediated protein transport by generating membrane curvature at subdomains on the Endoplasmic Reticulum, where it is activated by the guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) Sec12. Crystal structures of GDP- and GTP-bound forms of Sar1 suggest that it undergoes a conformational switch in which GTP binding enhances the exposure of an amino-terminal amphipathic helix necessary for efficient membrane penetration. However, key residues in the amino-terminus were not resolved in crystal structures, and experimental studies have suggested that the amino-terminus of Sar1 is solvent-exposed in the absence of membrane, even in the GDP-bound state. Therefore, the molecular mechanism by which GTP binding activates the membrane remodeling activity of Sar1 remains unclear. Using atomistic molecular dynamics simulations, we compare the membrane binding and curvature generation activities of Sar1 in its GDP- and GTP-bound states. We show that in the GTP-bound state, Sar1 inserts into the membrane with its complete (residues 1-23) amphipathic amino-terminal helix, while Sar1-GDP binds to the membrane only through its first 12 residues. Such differential membrane binding modes translate into significant differences in the protein volume inserted into the membrane. As a result, Sar1-GTP generates positive membrane curvature 10-20 times higher than Sar1-GDP. Dimerization of the GTP-bound form of Sar1 further amplifies curvature generation. Taken together, our results present a detailed molecular mechanism for how the nucleotide-bound state of Sar1 regulates its membrane binding and remodeling activities in a concentration dependent manner, paving the way toward a better understanding COPII-mediated membrane transport. Significance Statement: Amphipathic helices play established roles in penetrating lipid bilayers to produce local membrane curvature. The degree of curvature generated has been suggested to depend on the penetration depth of the amphipathic helix, its amino acid sequence, and the protein volume inserted into the membrane. However, the relative contributions of each of these factors in membrane bending remain unclear. Using the Sar1 protein monomer bound to different nucleotides (GDP vs. GTP) and its GTP-bound dimeric form as examples, we explicitly show that while the precise amino acid sequence and insertion depth of the amphipathic helix are relevant, the generated membrane curvature is most correlated with the volume of protein insertion into the membrane.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.07.20.500836

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90138-4 · DOI
  2. 10.1242/jcs.069773 · DOI
  3. 10.1083/jcb.114.4.663 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.025 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.10.006 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/emboj/cdf605 · DOI
  7. 10.1073/pnas.1605916113 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1083/jcb.200106039 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/nature01040 · DOI
  10. 10.1021/bi962252b · DOI
  11. 10.1074/jbc.271.3.1573 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nrm3117 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.str.2010.11.004 · DOI
  14. 10.1074/jbc.M115.672287 · DOI
  15. 2010, Multiscale simulation of protein mediated membrane remodeling in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 21, 357
  16. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002892 · DOI
  17. 10.1529/biophysj.108.132563 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.08.051 · DOI
  19. 10.1073/pnas.0603917103 · DOI
  20. 10.1529/biophysj.107.121160 · DOI
  21. 2020, Molecular simulation of mechanical properties and membrane activities of the escrt-iii complexes, Biophys. J, 118, 1333, 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.01.033 · DOI
  22. 2021, Protein-induced membrane curvature in coarsegrained simulations, Biophys. J, 120, 3211, 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.05.029 · DOI
  23. L Harker-Kirschneck , et al., Physical mechanisms of escrt-iii–driven cell division. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 119 (2022). · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.02.037 · DOI
  25. 2014, Synaptotagmin’s role in neurotransmitter release likely involves ca2+-induced conformational transition, Biophys. J, 107, 1156, 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.041 · DOI
  26. 2020, Variance of atomic coordinates as a dynamical metric to distinguish proteins and protein–protein interactions in molecular dynamics simulations, J. Phys. Chem. B, 124, 4247, 10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c01191 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.08.023 · DOI
  28. 10.1083/jcb.201004132 · DOI
  29. 10.1083/jcb.200509095 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/s41467-018-02974-x · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81577-9 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/tra.12084 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.08.131 · DOI
  34. 10.1529/biophysj.108.133173 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.06.033 · DOI
  36. 10.1073/pnas.1709120114 · DOI
  37. 10.1002/jcc.20945 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1093/nar/gky427 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1016/0010-4655(95)00042-E · DOI
  42. 10.1038/nmeth.4067 · DOI
  43. 10.1002/jcc.21287 · DOI
  44. 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00935 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.03.015 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Paul, S., Audhya, A., & Cui, Q.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Cui, Qiang
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-07-21
Volume
120
Issue
8
Pages
e2212513120-e2212513120
ISSN
0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4320483783
Cited by
22
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1661900)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM134865)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
Sar1 GTPase, membrane remodeling, GTP binding, protein dimerization, amphipathic helix, membrane insertion, GDP-bound state, endoplasmic reticulum
MeSH terms
Guanosine Triphosphate, Dimerization, Monomeric GTP-Binding Proteins, Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors, Protein Transport, Vesicular Transport Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review