PreprintCited by 2Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionComputational Drug Discovery Methods

3D-Beacons: Decreasing the gap between protein sequences and structures through a federated network of protein structure data resources

Open access
Varadi, Mihaly, Nair, Sreenath, Sillitoe, Ian, Tauriello, Gerardo, Anyango, Stephen, Bienert, Stefan, Borges, Clemente, Deshpande, Mandar +24 more·2022·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Preprint — published as 10.1093/gigascience/giac118 · Paper page

Abstract

While scientists can often infer the biological function of proteins from their 3-dimensional quaternary structures, the gap between the number of known protein sequences and their experimentally determined structures keeps increasing. A potential solution to this problem is presented by ever more sophisticated computational protein modelling approaches. While often powerful on their own, most methods have strengths and weaknesses. Therefore, it benefits researchers to examine models from various model providers and perform comparative analysis to identify what models can best address their specific use cases. To make data from a large array of model providers more easily accessible to the broader scientific community, we established 3D-Beacons, a collaborative initiative to create a federated network with unified data access mechanisms. The 3D-Beacons Network allows researchers to collate coordinate files and metadata for experimentally determined and theoretical protein models from state-of-the-art and specialist model providers and also from the Protein Data Bank.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.08.01.501973

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Varadi, M., Nair, S., Sillitoe, I., Tauriello, G., Anyango, S., Bienert, S., Borges, C., Deshpande, M., Green, T., Hassabis, D., Hatos, A., Hegedus, T., Hekkelman, M. L., Joosten, R., Jumper, J., Laydon, A., Molodenskiy, D., Piovesan, D., Salladini, E., Salzberg, S. L., Sommer, M. J., Steinegger, M., Suhajda, E., Svergun, D., Tenorio-Ku, L., Tosatto, S., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Waterhouse, A. M., Žídek, A., Schwede, T., Orengo, C., & Velankar, S.
Affiliations
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
  • Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Schwede, Torsten
  • Orengo, Christine
  • Velankar, Sameer
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-08-03
OpenAlex
W4289637442
Cited by
2
References
3
Citations by year
2023: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation (2021-R1C1-C102065)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (2021-R1C1-C102065)
  • Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/S020071/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
protein structure prediction, federated data network, comparative model evaluation, Protein Data Bank

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review