PreprintCited by 778Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene Regulatory Network Analysis

SCENIC+: single-cell multiomic inference of enhancers and gene regulatory networks

Open access
González-Blas, Carmen Bravo, De Winter, Seppe, Hulselmans, Gert, Hecker, Nikolai, Matetovici, Irina, Christiaens, Valerie, Poovathingal, Suresh, Wouters, Jasper +2 more·2022·Nature Methods

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41592-023-01938-4 · Paper page

Abstract

Joint profiling of chromatin accessibility and gene expression of individual cells provides an opportunity to decipher enhancer-driven gene regulatory networks (eGRN). Here we present a new method for the inference of eGRNs, called SCENIC+. SCENIC+ predicts genomic enhancers along with candidate upstream transcription factors (TF) and links these enhancers to candidate target genes. Specific TFs for each cell type or cell state are predicted based on the concordance of TF binding site accessibility, TF expression, and target gene expression. To improve both recall and precision of TF identification, we curated and clustered more than 40,000 position weight matrices that we could associate with 1,553 human TFs. We validated and benchmarked each of the SCENIC+ components on diverse data sets from different species, including human peripheral blood mononuclear cell types, ENCODE cell lines, human melanoma cell states, and Drosophila retinal development. Next, we exploit SCENIC+ predictions to study conserved TFs, enhancers, and GRNs between human and mouse cell types in the cerebral cortex. Finally, we provide new capabilities that exploit the inferred eGRNs to study the dynamics of gene regulation along differentiation trajectories; to map regulatory activities onto tissues using spatial omics data; and to predict the effect of TF perturbations on cell state. SCENIC+ provides critical insight into gene regulation, starting from multiome atlases of scATAC-seq and scRNA-seq. The SCENIC+ suite is available as a set of Python modules at https://scenicplus.readthedocs.io .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.08.19.504505

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Methods for inferring enhancer-driven GRNs that integrate enhancer sequence, chromatin accessibility and gene expression found that accuracy to predict active enhancers increases by approximately 10% compared to using accessibility alone.

    “methods for inferring enhancer-driven GRNs (eGRNs) that integrate enhancer sequence, chromatin accessibility and gene expression22–24 found that the accuracy to predict active enhancers increases by ~10% compared to using accessibility alone25.”
  • Gene-regulatory network modelling approaches reconstruct systematic gene-gene associations from unperturbed single-cell omics data.

    “In this respect, gene-regulatory network (GRN) modelling approaches are promising as they reconstruct systematic gene–gene associations from unperturbed single-cell omics data6–11.”
  • SCENIC+, FigR and MIRA model joint variation across paired transcriptomic and scATAC-seq measurements to link enhancers to genes and identify transcription factors that drive cellular decisions.

    “These include SCENIC+176, functional inference of gene regulation (FigR)177, and probabilistic multimodal models for integrated regulatory analysis (MIRA)178, which model joint variation across paired transcriptomic and scATAC-seq measurements to link enhancers to genes and to identify transcription factors that drive cellular decisions.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 169 · Cited by 778

Authors
González-Blas, C. B., De Winter, S., Hulselmans, G., Hecker, N., Matetovici, I., Christiaens, V., Poovathingal, S., Wouters, J., Aibar, S., & Aerts, S.
Affiliations
  • VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research (BE)
  • Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (BE)
Corresponding author
Aerts, Stein
Venue
Nature Methods
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-08-19
Volume
20
Issue
9
Pages
1355-1367
ISSN
1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4384198561
Cited by
778
References
169
Citations by year
2026: 279 · 2025: 280 · 2024: 153 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
68.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (G094121N, 11F1519N)
  • KU Leuven
  • Fondation contre le Cancer
  • Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
SCENIC, gene regulatory networks, chromatin accessibility, single-cell multi-omics, transcription factor identification, transcription factor binding motifs, cross-species conservation, differentiation trajectories, transcription factor perturbation
MeSH terms
Multiomics, Animals, Chromatin, Drosophila, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Leukocytes, Mononuclear, Mice, Gene Regulatory Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review