SCENIC+: single-cell multiomic inference of enhancers and gene regulatory networks
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41592-023-01938-4 · Paper page
Abstract
Joint profiling of chromatin accessibility and gene expression of individual cells provides an opportunity to decipher enhancer-driven gene regulatory networks (eGRN). Here we present a new method for the inference of eGRNs, called SCENIC+. SCENIC+ predicts genomic enhancers along with candidate upstream transcription factors (TF) and links these enhancers to candidate target genes. Specific TFs for each cell type or cell state are predicted based on the concordance of TF binding site accessibility, TF expression, and target gene expression. To improve both recall and precision of TF identification, we curated and clustered more than 40,000 position weight matrices that we could associate with 1,553 human TFs. We validated and benchmarked each of the SCENIC+ components on diverse data sets from different species, including human peripheral blood mononuclear cell types, ENCODE cell lines, human melanoma cell states, and Drosophila retinal development. Next, we exploit SCENIC+ predictions to study conserved TFs, enhancers, and GRNs between human and mouse cell types in the cerebral cortex. Finally, we provide new capabilities that exploit the inferred eGRNs to study the dynamics of gene regulation along differentiation trajectories; to map regulatory activities onto tissues using spatial omics data; and to predict the effect of TF perturbations on cell state. SCENIC+ provides critical insight into gene regulation, starting from multiome atlases of scATAC-seq and scRNA-seq. The SCENIC+ suite is available as a set of Python modules at https://scenicplus.readthedocs.io .
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Methods for inferring enhancer-driven GRNs that integrate enhancer sequence, chromatin accessibility and gene expression found that accuracy to predict active enhancers increases by approximately 10% compared to using accessibility alone.
“methods for inferring enhancer-driven GRNs (eGRNs) that integrate enhancer sequence, chromatin accessibility and gene expression22–24 found that the accuracy to predict active enhancers increases by ~10% compared to using accessibility alone25.”
From Enhancer grammar of liver cell types and hepatocyte zonation states (2022) · cites this paper as [24]
Gene-regulatory network modelling approaches reconstruct systematic gene-gene associations from unperturbed single-cell omics data.
“In this respect, gene-regulatory network (GRN) modelling approaches are promising as they reconstruct systematic gene–gene associations from unperturbed single-cell omics data6–11.”
From Dissecting cell identity via network inference and in silico gene perturbation (2023) · cites this paper as [11]
SCENIC+, FigR and MIRA model joint variation across paired transcriptomic and scATAC-seq measurements to link enhancers to genes and identify transcription factors that drive cellular decisions.
“These include SCENIC+176, functional inference of gene regulation (FigR)177, and probabilistic multimodal models for integrated regulatory analysis (MIRA)178, which model joint variation across paired transcriptomic and scATAC-seq measurements to link enhancers to genes and to identify transcription factors that drive cellular decisions.”
From The technological landscape and applications of single-cell multi-omics (2023) · cites this paper as [176]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 169 · Cited by 778
- Authors
- González-Blas, C. B., De Winter, S., Hulselmans, G., Hecker, N., Matetovici, I., Christiaens, V., Poovathingal, S., Wouters, J., Aibar, S., & Aerts, S.
- Affiliations
- VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research (BE)
- Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Aerts, Stein
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Methods
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-08-19
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1355-1367
- ISSN
- 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10482700
- OpenAlex
- W4384198561
- Cited by
- 778
- References
- 169
- Citations by year
- 2026: 279 · 2025: 280 · 2024: 153 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 68.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Nature Methods (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (G094121N, 11F1519N)
- KU Leuven
- Fondation contre le Cancer
- Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Keywords
- SCENIC, gene regulatory networks, chromatin accessibility, single-cell multi-omics, transcription factor identification, transcription factor binding motifs, cross-species conservation, differentiation trajectories, transcription factor perturbation
- MeSH terms
- Multiomics, Animals, Chromatin, Drosophila, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Leukocytes, Mononuclear, Mice, Gene Regulatory Networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review