From sequence to function through structure: deep learning for protein design
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.11.014
Abstract
The process of designing biomolecules, in particular proteins, is witnessing a rapid change in available tooling and approaches, moving from design through physicochemical force fields, to producing plausible, complex sequences fast via end-to-end differentiable statistical models. To achieve conditional and controllable protein design, researchers at the interface of artificial intelligence and biology leverage advances in natural language processing (NLP) and computer vision techniques, coupled with advances in computing hardware to learn patterns from growing biological databases, curated annotations thereof, or both. Once learned, these patterns can be leveraged to provide novel insights into mechanistic biology and the design of biomolecules. However, navigating and understanding the practical applications for the many recent protein design tools is complex. To facilitate this, we 1) document recent advances in deep learning (DL) assisted protein design from the last three years, 2) present a practical pipeline that allows to go from de novo -generated sequences to their predicted properties and web-powered visualization within minutes, and 3) leverage it to suggest a generated protein sequence which might be used to engineer a biosynthetic gene cluster to produce a molecular glue-like compound. Lastly, we discuss challenges and highlight opportunities for the protein design field. Availability: pLM generated and UniRef50 sampled sequence sets and predictions are available at http://data.bioembeddings.com/public/design . Code-base and Notebooks for analysis are available at https://github.com/hefeda/PGP . An online version of Table 1 can be found at https://github.com/hefeda/design_tools .
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
GenSLMs: Genome-scale language models reveal SARS-CoV-2 evolutionary dynamics
Zvyagin, M., Brace, A., Hippe, K., Deng, Y., Zhang, B., Bohorquez, C. O., Clyde, A., Kale, B., Perez-Rivera, D., Ma, H., et al. (2023) · The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications · doi:10.1177/10943420231201154 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Ferruz, N., Heinzinger, M., Akdel, M., Goncearenco, A., Naef, L., & Dallago, C.
- Affiliations
- Universitat de Girona (ES)
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Ferruz, Noelia
- Dallago, Christian
- ORCID
- Venue
- Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-09-03
- Volume
- 21
- Pages
- 238-250
- ISSN
- 2001-0370 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9755234
- OpenAlex
- W4309485183
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 2.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
- Technische Universität München
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- protein design, deep learning, protein structure prediction, protein property prediction, molecular glues, mechanistic biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review