PreprintCited by 21Protein Structure and DynamicsGeometric and Algebraic TopologyEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Topological Links in Predicted Protein Complex Structures Reveal Limitations of AlphaFold

Open access
Hou, Yingnan, Xie, Tengyu, He, Liuqing, Tao, Liang, Huang, Jing·2022·Communications Biology

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s42003-023-05489-4

Abstract

AlphaFold is making great progress in protein structure prediction, not only for single-chain proteins but also for multi-chain protein complexes. When using AlphaFold-Multimer to predict protein–protein complexes, we observed some unusual structures in which chains are looped around each other to form topologically intertwining links at the interface. To our knowledge, such topological links are never observed in the experimental structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). Although it is well known and has been well studied that protein structures may have topologically complex shapes such as knots and links, existing methods are hampered by the chain closure problem and show poor performance in identifying topologically linked structures in protein–protein complexes. Therefore, we address the chain closure problem by using sliding windows from a local perspective and propose an algorithm to measure the topological–geometric features that can be used to identify topologically linked structures. An application of the method to AlphaFold-Multimer-predicted protein complex structures finds that approximately 0.7% of the predicted structures contain topological links. The method presented in this work will facilitate the computational study of protein–protein interactions and help further improve the structural prediction of multi-chain protein complexes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.09.14.507881

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 2020, Improved protein structure prediction using potentials from deep learning, Nature, 577, 706, 10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Evans, R. , et al., Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. BioRxiv, 2021. · DOI · Paper page
  4. 2022, AF2Complex predicts direct physical interactions in multimeric proteins with deep learning, Nature communications, 13, 1
  5. 2022, Improved prediction of protein–protein interactions using AlphaFold2, Nature communications, 13, 1
  6. Ghani, U. , et al., Improved docking of protein models by a combination of alphafold2 and cluspro. BioRxiv, 2021. · DOI · Paper page
  7. 2022, Structural validation and assessment of AlphaFold2 predictions for centrosomal and centriolar proteins and their complexes, Communications Biology, 5, 1
  8. 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.02.078 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.289.5487.2129 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/nsb0494-213 · DOI
  11. 10.1021/ja00120a001 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/35022623 · DOI
  13. 10.1073/pnas.1205918109 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/nar/gkw308 · DOI
  15. 2020, GISA: using Gauss Integrals to identify rare conformations in protein structures, PeerJ, 8, e9159, 10.7717/peerj.9159 · DOI
  16. 2020, GLN: a method to reveal unique properties of lasso type topology in proteins, Scientific reports, 10, 1
  17. 2021, Topoly: Python package to analyze topology of polymers, Briefings in Bioinformatics, 22, bbaa196, 10.1093/bib/bbaa196 · DOI
  18. 10.1088/1361-648x/ab2f19 · DOI
  19. 10.1042/BST20120339 · DOI
  20. 2014, Pierced lasso bundles are a new class of knot-like motifs, PLoS computational biology, 10, e1003613, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003613 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/nar/gkm312 · DOI
  22. 2016, Complex lasso: new entangled motifs in proteins, Scientific reports, 6, 1
  23. 2021, Lasso Proteins—Unifying Cysteine Knots and Miniproteins, Polymers, 13, 3988, 10.3390/polym13223988 · DOI
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2211 · DOI
  25. Meeks, W. and J. Pérez , A survey on classical minimal surface theory. Vol. 60. 2012: American Mathematical Soc. · DOI
  26. White, J.H. , Self-linking and the Gauss integral in higher dimensions. 1968: University of Minnesota. · DOI
  27. Dabrowski-Tumanski, P. , et al., LinkProt: a database collecting information about biological links. Nucleic acids research, 2016: p. gkw976. · DOI
  28. 2017, Structural entanglements in protein complexes, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 146, 225102, 10.1063/1.4985221 · DOI
  29. 2016, Linking in domain-swapped protein dimers, Scientific reports, 6, 1
  30. 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.07.016 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1126/science.aaw6718 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 2022, Benchmarking AlphaFold for protein complex modeling reveals accuracy determinants, Protein Science, 31, e4379, 10.1002/pro.4379 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Ganea, O.-E. , et al., Independent se (3)-equivariant models for end-to-end rigid protein docking. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.07786, 2021. · arXiv
  34. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-1 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Hou, Y., Xie, T., He, L., Tao, L., & Huang, J.
Affiliations
Westlake University (CN)
Corresponding author
Huang, Jing
Venue
Communications Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-09-16
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
1098-1098
ISSN
2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388001385
Cited by
21
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Westlake University
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (LR19B030001, 32171247, 21803057, 31970129)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LQ23C050002, . LR20C010001, LR19B030001)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Geometric and Algebraic Topology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
protein-protein complex, AlphaFold-Multimer, protein structure prediction, protein knots, protein-protein interaction, sliding window algorithm
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review