The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transformers enable accurate prediction of acute and chronic chemical toxicity in aquatic organisms
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1126/sciadv.adk6669 · Paper page
Abstract
Environmental safety assessments, as mandated by many regulations, require that toxicity data is generated for up to three trophic levels, algae, aquatic invertebrates, and fish. Conducting these tests in vivo is resource-intensive, time-consuming, and causes undue suffering. Computational methods are fast and cost-efficient alternatives, however, their adaptation in regulatory settings has been slow, both due to low accuracy and narrow applicability domains. Here we present a new method for predicting chemical toxicity based on molecular structure. The method is based on a transformer, capturing structural features associated with toxicity, followed by a deep neural network that predicts the corresponding effect concentrations. After training on data from tens of thousands of exposure experiments, the model shows high predictive performance for each of the three trophic levels. Compared to commonly used QSAR methods, the model has both a larger applicability domain and a considerably lower error. In addition, training the model on data that combines multiple types of effect concentrations further improves the performance. We conclude that transformer-based models have the potential to significantly advance computational predictions of chemical toxicity and make in silico approaches a more attractive alternative when compared to animal-based exposure experiments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- 2016, Exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the USA: a population-based disease burden and cost analysis, Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 4, 996, 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30275-3 · DOI
- 2013, VEGA-QSAR: AI inside a platform for predictive toxicology. Proceedings of the workshop “Popularize Artificial Intelligence 2013”, CEUR Workshop Proc, 1107, 21
- 2019, Industrial chemical regulation in the European Union and the United States: a comparison of REACH and the amended TSCA, J. Risk Res, 22, 1187, 10.1080/13669877.2018.1454495 · DOI
- 10.1021/jm4004285 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, Predictive modeling of estrogen receptor agonism, antagonism, and binding activities using machine- and deep-learning approaches, Lab. Investig, 101, 490, 10.1038/s41374-020-00477-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.envint.2015.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
- ECHA, 2008. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.10: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for environment.
- 10.1002/jcc.24764 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Artificial Intelligence-Based Toxicity Prediction of Environmental Chemicals: Future Directions for Chemical Management Applications, Environ. Sci. Technol, 56, 7532, 10.1021/acs.est.1c07413 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature14539 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1816039116 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1321082111 · DOI
- Mayr, A. , Klambauer, G. , Unterthiner, T. , Hochreiter, S. , 2016. DeepTox: Toxicity prediction using deep learning. Front. Environ. Sci. 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2015.00080 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, QSAR without borders, Chem. Soc. Rev, 49, 3525, 10.1039/D0CS00098A · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature02317 · DOI
- 1987, Acute bioassays and hazard evaluation of representative contaminants detected in great lakes fish, Environ. Toxicol. Chem, 6, 901, 10.1002/etc.5620061111 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.est.1c04158 · DOI · Paper page
- 2019, Mixtures of chemicals are important drivers of impacts on ecological status in European surface waters, Environ. Sci. Eur, 31, 71, 10.1186/s12302-019-0247-4 · DOI
- 10.1038/461472a · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, Bees and pesticide regulation: Lessons from the neonicotinoid experience, Biol. Conserv, 241, 108356, 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108356 · DOI
- 2019, Ensemble QSAR Modeling to Predict Multispecies Fish Toxicity Lethal Concentrations and Points of Departure, Environ. Sci. Technol, 53, 12793, 10.1021/acs.est.9b03957 · DOI
- 2019, Comparative Study of Multitask Toxicity Modeling on a Broad Chemical Space, J. Chem. Inf. Model, 59, 1062, 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00685 · DOI · Paper page
- 0402, Removing the threat of diclofenac to critically endangered Asian vultures, PLoS Biol, 4, 0395
- 10.1210/jc.2014-4324 · DOI
- 2020, Screening-Level Estimates of Environmental Release Rates, Predicted Exposures, and Toxic Pressures of Currently Used Chemicals, Environ. Toxicol. Chem, 39, 1839, 10.1002/etc.4801 · DOI
- 2022, Safe and sustainable by design: A computer-based approach to redesign chemicals for reduced environmental hazards, Chemosphere, 296, 134050, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134050 · DOI
- 2021, Towards ‘one substance – one assessment’: An analysis of EU chemical registration and aquatic risk assessment frameworks, J. Environ. Manage, 280, 111692, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111692 · DOI
- Vaswani, A. , Shazeer, N. , Parmar, N. , Uszkoreit, J. , Jones, L. , Gomez, A.N. , Kaiser, L. , Polosukhin, I. , 2017. Attention Is All You Need. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2017-Decem, 5999–6009.
- 2020, Toward a Global Understanding of Chemical Pollution: A First Comprehensive Analysis of National and Regional Chemical Inventories, Environ. Sci. Technol, 54, 5
- 2016, The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship, Sci. Data, 3, 160018, 10.1038/sdata.2016.18 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Gustavsson, M., Käll, S., Svedberg, P., Inda-Diaz, J. S., Molander, S., Coria, J., Backhaus, T., & Kristiansson, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Kristiansson, Erik
- ORCID
- Venue
- Science Advances
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-04-18
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- eadk6669-eadk6669
- ISSN
- 2375-2548 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10917336
- OpenAlex
- W4392529738
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 38 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 9
- FWCI
- 17.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Science Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Vetenskapsrådet
- Göteborgs Universitet
- Framsenteret
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Keywords
- chemical toxicity prediction, transformer models, deep neural network, aquatic organisms, acute toxicity, chronic toxicity, effect concentrations, applicability domain, algae, aquatic invertebrates, fish, environmental hazard assessment
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Electric Power Supplies, Neural Networks, Computer, Aquatic Organisms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review