Anti-tau antibodies targeting a conformation-dependent epitope selectively bind seeds
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105252
Abstract
Neurodegenerative tauopathies are caused by transition of tau protein from a monomer to a toxic aggregate. They include Alzheimer disease (AD), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal degeneration (CBD), and Pick disease (PiD). We have previously proposed that tau monomer exists in two conformational ensembles: an inert form (M i ), which does not self-assemble; and seed-competent form (M s ), which self-assembles and templates ordered assembly growth. We proposed that cis/trans isomerization of tau at P301, the site of dominant disease-associated S/L mis-sense mutations, might underlie the transition of wild-type tau to a seed-competent state. Consequently, we created monoclonal antibodies using non-natural antigens consisting of fluorinated proline (P*) at the analogous P270 in R1, biased towards the trans-configuration at either the R1/R2 (TENLKHQP*GGGKVQIINKK) or R1/R3 (TENLKHQP*GGGKVQIVYK) interfaces. Two antibodies, MD2.2 and MD3.1 efficiently immunoprecipitated soluble seeds from AD and PSP, but not CBD or PiD. They stained brain samples of AD, PSP, and PiD, but not CBD. They did not immunoprecipitate, or immunostain tau from control brain. Creation of potent anti-seed antibodies based on the trans-proline epitope implicates local unfolding around P301 in pathogenesis. MD2.2 and MD3.1 may also be useful for therapy and diagnosis. Summary: Tau protein undergoes conformational change to self-assemble and trigger neurodegeneration. We have proposed local unfolding events centered on P301 cis/trans isomerization, which expose amyloidogenic sequences. We used a non-natural peptide with a trans-proline to generate monoclonal antibodies that distinguish tau seeds from native tau in human brain. In addition to being important therapeutic and diagnostic leads, the activity of these antibodies supports structural studies implicating local conformational change in tau that underlies disease initiation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Novel anti-tau antibodies specifically recognize disease-relevant tau strains and conformations.
“significant advancements have been made in the development of novel anti‐tau antibodies that specifically recognize disease‐relevant tau strains and conformations.”
From Senescence, brain inflammation, and oligomeric tau drive cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease: Evidence from clinical and preclinical studies (2024) · cites this paper as [180]
These anti-tau antibodies target unique conformational epitopes independent of specific linear amino acid sequences and exhibit preferences for different subsets of tau oligomers.
“These antibodies target unique conformational epitopes, independent of specific linear amino acid sequences, and exhibit preferences for different subsets of tau oligomers.”
From Senescence, brain inflammation, and oligomeric tau drive cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease: Evidence from clinical and preclinical studies (2024) · cites this paper as [180]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 51 · Cited by 15
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Drombosky, K.W., D. Chen, D. Woodard, L. Sari, M. Lin, M.I. Diamond, and L.A. Joachimiak. 2018. Native tau structure is disrupted by disease-associated mutations that promote aggregation. bioRxiv 330266.
- Authors
- Hitt, B. D., Gupta, A., Singh, R., Yang, T., Beaver, J. D., Shang, P., White, C. L., Joachimiak, L. A., & Diamond, M. I.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Diamond, Marc I.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-05-09
- Volume
- 299
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 105252-105252
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10582770
- OpenAlex
- W4386753594
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 2.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Alzheimer's Association (AACSF-591977)
- McCune Foundation
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Aging (P30AG012300, R01AG065407, RF1AG065407)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R25NS098987)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- anti-tau antibodies, conformational epitopes, cis-trans isomerization, tauopathy, Alzheimer's disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration, Pick's disease, tau aggregation, monoclonal antibodies, immunoprecipitation
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Epitopes, Brain, Humans, Proline, tau Proteins, Pick Disease of the Brain, Tauopathies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review