PreprintCited by 8DNA Repair MechanismsCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringPlant Molecular Biology Research

Plant PAXX has an XLF-like function and stimulates DNA end-joining by the Ku-DNA ligase IV-XRCC4 complex

Open access
Khan, Hira, Ochi, Takashi·2023·The Plant Journal

Preprint — published as 10.1111/tpj.16359 · Paper page

Abstract

Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) plays a major role in repairing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and is key to genome stability and editing. The minimal core NHEJ proteins, namely Ku70, Ku80, DNA ligase IV and XRCC4, are conserved, but other factors vary in different eukaryotes groups. In plants, known NHEJ proteins are the core factors only, and the molecular mechanism of plant NHEJ remains unclear. Here, we report a previously unidentified plant ortholog of PAXX, the crystal structure of which showed a similar fold to human PAXX. However, plant PAXX has similar molecular functions to human XLF, by directly interacting with Ku70/80 and XRCC4. This suggests that plant PAXX combines the roles of mammalian PAXX and XLF and that these functions merged into a single protein during evolution. This is consistent with a redundant function of PAXX and XLF in mammals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.05.26.542399

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Khan, H., & Ochi, T.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Ochi, Takashi
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-05-28
Volume
116
Issue
1
Pages
58-68
ISSN
0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4381470271
Cited by
8
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • The Plant Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • University of Leeds
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/V003577/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
Keywords
PAXX, X-ray luminosity function, non-homologous end joining, DNA double-strand break repair, Ku70/80, DNA ligase IV, XRCC4, DNA end joining, plant DNA repair, protein crystal structure, protein evolution, genome stability
MeSH terms
DNA Ligase ATP, Animals, DNA, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Mammals, Trisaccharides, DNA Repair Enzymes, DNA End-Joining Repair

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review