PreprintCited by 5Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFractal and DNA sequence analysisAlgorithms and Data Compression

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

EMMA: A New Method for Computing Multiple Sequence Alignments given a Constraint Subset Alignment

Open access
Shen, Chengze, Liu, Baqiao, Williams, Kelly P, Warnow, Tandy·2023·Algorithms for Molecular Biology

Preprint — published as 10.1186/s13015-023-00247-x · Paper page

Abstract

Background: Adding sequences into an existing (possibly user-provided) alignment has multiple applications, including updating a large alignment with new data, adding sequences into a constraint alignment constructed using biological knowledge, or computing alignments in the presence of sequence length heterogeneity. Although this is a natural problem, only a few tools have been developed to use this information with high fidelity. Results: We present EMMA (Extending Multiple alignments using MAFFT-add) for the problem of adding a set of unaligned sequences into a multiple sequence alignment (i.e., a constraint alignment). EMMA builds on MAFFT-add, which is also designed to add sequences into a given constraint alignment. EMMA improves on MAFFT--add methods by using a divide-and-conquer framework to scale its most accurate version, MAFFT-linsi--add, to constraint alignments with many sequences. We show that EMMA has an accuracy advantage over other techniques for adding sequences into alignments under many realistic conditions and can scale to large datasets with high accuracy (hundreds of thousands of sequences). EMMA is available at https://github.com/c5shen/EMMA . Conclusions: EMMA is a new tool that provides high accuracy and scalability for adding sequences into an existing alignment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.06.12.544642

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 2006, Multiple sequence alignment for phylogenetic purposes, Australian Systematic Botany, 19, 479, 10.1071/SB06020 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.sbi.2007.03.001 · DOI
  3. 10.1186/s13059-015-0688-z · DOI
  4. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad007 · DOI
  5. 10.1089/cmb.2021.0585 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/bioadv/vbad024 · DOI
  7. Park, M. , Warnow, T. : HMMerge: an ensemble method for multiple sequence alignment. Bioinformatics Advances, 052 (2023) · DOI
  8. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw412 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts578 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/molbev/msv333 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa992 · DOI
  12. 10.1089/cmb.2014.0156 · DOI
  13. 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr553 · DOI
  15. 10.1126/science.1171243 · DOI
  16. 10.1186/1471-2105-3-2 · DOI
  17. 10.1093/molbev/msp098 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.2.157 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTAB788 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty495 · DOI
  21. 10.1371/journal.pone.0018093 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1021/bi050293e · DOI
  23. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/nar/gkaa913 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1126/science.1171243 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/msb.2011.75 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/sysbio/syr095 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Shen, C., Liu, B., Williams, K. P., & Warnow, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Sandia National Laboratories California (US)
Corresponding author
Warnow, Tandy
Venue
Algorithms for Molecular Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-06-12
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
21-21
ISSN
1748-7188 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389430430
Cited by
5
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Algorithms for Molecular Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2006069, NA0003525, DE‐NA0003525)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DENA0003525, NA0003525)
  • National Nuclear Security Administration (NA0003525, contract DE-NA0003525, DENA-0003525)
  • Laboratory Directed Research and Development (NA0003525, DE-NA0003525)
  • Sandia National Laboratories (NA0003525, DE‐NA,0003525)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Theoretical Computer Science › Algorithms and Data Compression
Keywords
multiple sequence alignment, Emma, MAFFT, divide-and-conquer, alignment accuracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review