PreprintCited by 5Ubiquitin and proteasome pathwaysProtein Degradation and InhibitorsAutophagy in Disease and Therapy

C-terminal amides mark proteins for degradation via SCF/FBXO31

Open access
Muhar, Matthias, Farnung, Jakob, Hofmann, Raphael, Cernakova, Martina, Sidiropoulos, Nikolaos D., Bode, Jeffrey W., Corn, Jacob E.·2023·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41586-024-08475-w

Abstract

During normal cellular homeostasis unfolded and mis-localized proteins are recognized and removed, preventing the build-up of toxic byproducts 1 . When protein homeostasis is perturbed during aging, neurodegeneration or cellular stress, proteins can accumulate several forms of chemical damage through reactive metabolites 2, 3 . Such modifications have been proposed to trigger the selective removal of chemically marked proteins 3–6; however, discovering modifications sufficient to induce protein degradation has remained challenging. Using a semi-synthetic chemical biology approach coupled to cellular assays, we found that C-terminal amide-bearing proteins (CTAPs) are rapidly cleared from human cells. A CRISPR screen identified the SCF/FBXO31 ubiquitin ligase as a reader of C-terminal amides, which ubiquitylates CTAPs for subsequent proteasomal degradation. A conserved binding pocket enables FBXO31 to bind almost any C-terminal peptide bearing an amide while retaining exquisite selectivity over non-modified clients. This mechanism facilitates binding and turnover of endogenous CTAPs that are formed following oxidative stress. A dominant human mutation found in neurodevelopmental disorders switches CTAP recognition, such that non-amidated neosubstrates are now degraded and FBXO31 becomes markedly toxic. We propose that CTAPs may represent the vanguard of a largely unexplored class of modified amino acid degrons that could provide a general strategy for selective yet broad surveillance of chemically damaged proteins.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.06.29.547030

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Muhar, M., Farnung, J., Hofmann, R., Cernakova, M., Sidiropoulos, N. D., Bode, J. W., & Corn, J. E.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Bode, Jeffrey W.
  • Corn, Jacob E.
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-06-30
OpenAlex
W4382698606
Cited by
5
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (898175)
  • Branco Weiss Fellowship – Society in Science
  • Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
  • NOMIS Stiftung
  • Functional Genomics Center Zurich
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
Keywords
FBXO31, SCF ubiquitin ligase, protein degradation, ubiquitination, proteasomal degradation, oxidative stress, proteostasis, CRISPR screen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review