C-terminal amides mark proteins for degradation via SCF/FBXO31
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41586-024-08475-w
Abstract
During normal cellular homeostasis unfolded and mis-localized proteins are recognized and removed, preventing the build-up of toxic byproducts 1 . When protein homeostasis is perturbed during aging, neurodegeneration or cellular stress, proteins can accumulate several forms of chemical damage through reactive metabolites 2, 3 . Such modifications have been proposed to trigger the selective removal of chemically marked proteins 3–6; however, discovering modifications sufficient to induce protein degradation has remained challenging. Using a semi-synthetic chemical biology approach coupled to cellular assays, we found that C-terminal amide-bearing proteins (CTAPs) are rapidly cleared from human cells. A CRISPR screen identified the SCF/FBXO31 ubiquitin ligase as a reader of C-terminal amides, which ubiquitylates CTAPs for subsequent proteasomal degradation. A conserved binding pocket enables FBXO31 to bind almost any C-terminal peptide bearing an amide while retaining exquisite selectivity over non-modified clients. This mechanism facilitates binding and turnover of endogenous CTAPs that are formed following oxidative stress. A dominant human mutation found in neurodevelopmental disorders switches CTAP recognition, such that non-amidated neosubstrates are now degraded and FBXO31 becomes markedly toxic. We propose that CTAPs may represent the vanguard of a largely unexplored class of modified amino acid degrons that could provide a general strategy for selective yet broad surveillance of chemically damaged proteins.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Ivan, M., Kondo, K., Yang, H., Kim, W., Valiando, J., Ohh, M., Salic, A., Asara, J. M., Lane, W. S., & Kaelin Jr., W. G. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1059817 · Cited by 4,735 · see citing works
Perineuronal nets stabilize the grid cell network
Christensen, A. C., Lensjø, K. K., Lepperød, M. E., Dragly, S.-A., Sutterud, H., Blackstad, J. S., Fyhn, M., & Hafting, T. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20241-w · Cited by 1,865 · see citing works
Ubiquitin ligases: structure, function, and regulation
Zheng, N., & Shabek, N. (2017) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014922 · Cited by 1,499 · see citing works
How many human proteoforms are there?
Aebersold, R., Agar, J. N., Amster, I. J., Baker, M. S., Bertozzi, C. R., Boja, E. S., Costello, C. E., Cravatt, B. F., Fenselau, C., Garcia, B. A., et al. (2018) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.2576 · Cited by 907 · see citing works
Evaluation and Design of Genome-Wide CRISPR/SpCas9 Knockout Screens
Hart, T., Tong, A. H. Y., Chan, K., Van Leeuwen, J., Seetharaman, A., Aregger, M., Chandrashekhar, M., Hustedt, N., Seth, S., Noonan, A., et al. (2017) · G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.117.041277 · Cited by 599 · see citing works
Recognition of the Diglycine C-End Degron by CRL2KLHDC2 Ubiquitin Ligase
Rusnac, D.-V., Lin, H.-C., Canzani, D., Tien, K. X., Hinds, T. R., Tsue, A. F., Bush, M. F., Yen, H.-C. S., & Zheng, N. (2018) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.10.021 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Muhar, M., Farnung, J., Hofmann, R., Cernakova, M., Sidiropoulos, N. D., Bode, J. W., & Corn, J. E.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Bode, Jeffrey W.
- Corn, Jacob E.
- ORCID
- Venue
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-06-30
- OpenAlex
- W4382698606
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission (898175)
- Branco Weiss Fellowship – Society in Science
- Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
- NOMIS Stiftung
- Functional Genomics Center Zurich
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
- Keywords
- FBXO31, SCF ubiquitin ligase, protein degradation, ubiquitination, proteasomal degradation, oxidative stress, proteostasis, CRISPR screen
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review