PreprintCited by 52Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improved protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-multimer by denoising the MSA profile

Open access
Bryant, Patrick, Noé, Frank·2023·PLoS Computational Biology

Preprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012253 · Paper page

Abstract

Structure prediction of protein complexes has improved significantly with AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold-multimer (AFM), but only 60% of dimers are accurately predicted. A way to improve the predictions is to inject noise to generate more diverse predictions. However, thousands of predictions are needed to obtain a few that are accurate in difficult cases. Here, we learn a bias to the MSA representation that improves the predictions by performing gradient descent through the AFM network. We effectively denoise the MSA profile, similar to how a blurry image would be sharpened. We demonstrate the performance on seven difficult targets from CASP15 and increase the average MMscore to 0.76 compared to 0.63 with AFM. We evaluate the procedure on 334 protein complexes where AFM fails and demonstrate an increased success rate (MMscore>0.75) of 8% on these hard targets. Our protocol, AFProfile, provides a way to direct predictions towards a defined target function guided by the MSA. We expect gradient descent over the MSA to be useful for different tasks, such as generating alternative conformations. AFProfile is freely available at: https://github.com/patrickbryant1/AFProfile

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.07.04.547638

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 10.1093/nar/gkp318 · DOI
  2. 10.1101/2022.12.08.519586 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/s41467-021-27838-9 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 2023, Towards a structurally resolved human protein interaction network, Nat Struct Mol Biol, 30, 216, 10.1038/s41594-022-00910-8 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1101/2022.12.20.521205 · DOI
  7. 10.3389/fbinf.2022.959160 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.238101 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1101/2023.02.24.529906 · DOI
  10. 10.1101/2022.07.23.501214 · DOI
  11. 10.1101/2021.10.11.463937 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1002/pro.4653 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Progress at protein structure prediction, as seen in CASP15, 2023, Curr Opin Struct Biol, 80, 102594, 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102594 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1101/2022.10.17.512570 · DOI
  16. 10.1371/journal.pone.0161879 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 2011, Accelerated Profile HMM Searches, PLoS Computational Biology, 7, e1002195, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm098 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 2020, MGnify: the microbiome analysis resource in 2020, Nucleic Acids Res, 48, D570
  21. 2019, Protein-level assembly increases protein sequence recovery from metagenomic samples manyfold, Nature Methods, 16, 603, 10.1038/s41592-019-0437-4 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1093/nar/gkw1081 · DOI
  23. 10.1186/s12859-019-3019-7 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Kingma DP , Ba J. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. 2014. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980 · arXiv

Metadata

Authors
Bryant, P., & Noé, F.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Bryant, Patrick
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-07-04
Volume
20
Issue
7
Pages
e1012253-e1012253
ISSN
1553-734X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400974946
Cited by
52
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5
FWCI
6.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Universitätsbibliothek der FU Berlin Hochschulschriftenstelle u. Dokumentenserver (cc-by)
Funders
  • European Commission (2020 ‘, CoG 772230, ERC CoG 772230, 772230)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB1114/C03, SFB1114)
  • Technische Universität Dresden
  • Science for Life Laboratory (KAW 2020.0239)
  • Berlin Mathematics Research Center MATH+ (AA1-6, AA1-10, AA1-6, AA1-10)
  • National Supercomputer Centre, Linköpings Universitet (Berzelius-2023-267)
  • Zentrum für Informationsdienste und Hochleistungsrechnen, Technische Universität Dresden
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (772230 “ScaleCell”)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
protein complex structure prediction, AlphaFold-Multimer, multiple sequence alignment, CASP15
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Protein Folding, Computational Biology, Multiprotein Complexes, Protein Multimerization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review