PreprintCited by 43Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationMachine Learning in HealthcareElectronic Health Records Systems

Leveraging Large Language Models for Generating Responses to Patient Messages

Open access
Liu, Siru, McCoy, Allison B., Wright, Aileen P., Carew, Babatunde, Genkins, Julian Z., Huang, Sean S., Peterson, Josh F., Steitz, Bryan +1 more·2023·medRxiv

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to develop and assess the performance of fine-tuned large language models for generating responses to patient messages sent via an electronic health record patient portal. Methods: Utilizing a dataset of messages and responses extracted from the patient portal at a large academic medical center, we developed a model (CLAIR-Short) based on a pre-trained large language model (LLaMA-65B). In addition, we used the OpenAI API to update physician responses from an open-source dataset into a format with informative paragraphs that offered patient education while emphasizing empathy and professionalism. By combining with this dataset, we further fine-tuned our model (CLAIR-Long). To evaluate the fine-tuned models, we used ten representative patient portal questions in primary care to generate responses. We asked primary care physicians to review generated responses from our models and ChatGPT and rated them for empathy, responsiveness, accuracy, and usefulness. Results: The dataset consisted of a total of 499,794 pairs of patient messages and corresponding responses from the patient portal, with 5,000 patient messages and ChatGPT-updated responses from an online platform. Four primary care physicians participated in the survey. CLAIR-Short exhibited the ability to generate concise responses similar to provider’s responses. CLAIR-Long responses provided increased patient educational content compared to CLAIR-Short and were rated similarly to ChatGPT’s responses, receiving positive evaluations for responsiveness, empathy, and accuracy, while receiving a neutral rating for usefulness. Conclusion: Leveraging large language models to generate responses to patient messages demonstrates significant potential in facilitating communication between patients and primary care providers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.07.14.23292669

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LLMs in patient care could be used for education and empowerment by providing answers to medical questions and translating complex medical information into more accessible language.

    “In contrast to applications primarily aimed at healthcare professionals, LLMs in patient care could be used for education and empowerment by providing answers to medical questions and translating complex medical information into more accessible language4,13.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 43

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Li Y, Li Z, Zhang K, et al. ChatDoctor: A Medical Chat Model Fine-tuned on LLaMA Model using Medical Domain Knowledge. Published Online First: 24 March 2023.https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.14070v4 (accessed 26 Apr 2023).
  2. Peng B, Li C, He P, et al. Instruction Tuning with GPT-4. Published Online First: 6 April 2023.https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.03277v1 (accessed 26 Apr 2023).
  3. Zhang T, Kishore V, Wu F, et al. BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT. Published Online First: 21 April 2019.https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09675v3 (accessed 9 May 2023).

Authors
Liu, S., McCoy, A. B., Wright, A. P., Carew, B., Genkins, J. Z., Huang, S. S., Peterson, J. F., Steitz, B., & Wright, A.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Liu, Siru
Venue
medRxiv
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-07-16
OpenAlex
W4384455669
Cited by
43
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01LM013995-01, K99LM014097-01)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG062499)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
large language models, patient portal messages, fine-tuning, llamas, Clair, patient-physician communication, patient education, primary care, ChatGPT comparison, electronic health records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review