PreprintCited by 0Genomics and Rare DiseasesEnzyme Structure and FunctionProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

3Dmapper: A Command Line Tool For BioBank-scale Mapping Of Variants To Protein Structures

Open access
Ruiz-Serra, Victoria, Valentini, Samuel, Madroñero, Sergi, Valencia, Alfonso, Porta-Pardo, Eduard·2023·Bioinformatics

Preprint — published as 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae171 · Paper page

Abstract

The interpretation of genomic data is crucial to understand the molecular mechanisms of biological processes. Protein structures play a vital role in facilitating this interpretation by providing functional context to genetic coding variants. However, mapping genes to proteins is a tedious and error-prone task due to inconsistencies in data formats. Over the past two decades, numerous tools and databases have been developed to automatically map annotated positions and variants to protein structures. However, most of these tools are web-based and not well-suited for large-scale genomic data analysis. To address this issue, we introduce 3Dmapper, a standalone command-line tool developed in Python and R. It systematically maps annotated protein positions and variants to protein structures, providing a solution that is both efficient and reliable. 3Dmapper is freely available on GitHub at https://github.com/vicruiser/3Dmapper .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.09.01.555502

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 10.1038/nrg3031 · DOI
  2. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004147 · DOI
  3. 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0233 · DOI
  4. 2010, DMDM: domain mapping of disease mutations, Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl, 26, 2458
  5. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.060 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 2022, The structural coverage of the human proteome before and after AlphaFold, PLOS Comput. Biol, 18, e1009818, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009818 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1093/NAR/GKAC1052 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1093/nar/30.1.38 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.05.029 · DOI
  11. 2018, UCSF ChimeraX: Meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis, Protein Sci. Publ. Protein Soc, 27, 14, 10.1002/pro.3235 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1093/nar/gkx1153 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1038/nmeth.2289 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.15252/msb.202010016 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/s41586-020-2188-x · DOI · Paper page
  17. 2023, Towards a structurally resolved human protein interaction network, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol, 30, 216, 10.1038/s41594-022-00910-8 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 2022, Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2, Nat. Commun, 13, 1265, 10.1038/s41467-022-28865-w · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3_1 · DOI
  20. 2021, The Bio3D packages for structural bioinformatics, Protein Sci. Publ. Protein Soc, 30, 20, 10.1002/pro.3923 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/s41588-020-00774-y · DOI
  22. 2019, RAD51D splice variants and cancer-associated mutations reveal XRCC2 interaction to be critical for homologous recombination, DNA Repair, 76, 99, 10.1016/j.dnarep.2019.02.008 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.cell.2023.07.014 · DOI
  24. 10.1101/2023.01.25.525527 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Ruiz-Serra, V., Valentini, S., Madroñero, S., Valencia, A., & Porta-Pardo, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Trento (IT)
  • Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute (ES)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
Venue
Bioinformatics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-09-05
Volume
40
Issue
4
ISSN
1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4393407391
Cited by
0
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats
  • Barcelona Supercomputing Center
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
protein structure, genetic variants, genomic data interpretation, command-line tool, genome annotation
MeSH terms
Proteins, Software, Biological Specimen Banks, Genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review