PreprintCited by 1Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

Modeling flexible protein structure with AlphaFold2 and cross-linking mass spectrometry

Open access
Manalastas-Cantos, Karen, Adoni, Kish R., Pfeifer, Matthias, Märtens, Birgit, Grünewald, Kay, Thalassinos, Konstantinos, Topf, Maya·2023·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.mcpro.2024.100724

Abstract

We propose a pipeline that combines AlphaFold2 (AF2) and crosslinking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) to model the structure of proteins with multiple conformations. The pipeline consists of two main steps: ensemble generation using AF2, and conformer selection using XL-MS data. For conformer selection, we developed two scores – the monolink probability score (MP) and the crosslink probability score (XLP), both of which are based on residue depth. We benchmarked MP and XLP on a large dataset of decoy protein structures, and showed that our scores outperform previously developed scores. We then tested our methodology on three proteins having an open and closed conformation in the Protein Data Bank: Complement component 3 (C3), luciferase, and glutamine-binding periplasmic protein (QBP), first generating ensembles using AF2, which were then screened for the open and closed conformations using experimental XL-MS data. In five out of six cases, the most accurate model within the AF2 ensembles – or a conformation within 1 Å of this model – was identified using crosslinks, as assessed through the XLP score. In the remaining case, only the monolinks (assessed through the MP score) successfully identified the open conformation of QBP. This serves as a compelling proof-of-concept for the effectiveness of monolinks. In contrast, the AF2 assessment score (pTM) was only able to identify the most accurate conformation in two out of six cases. Our results highlight the complementarity of AF2 with experimental methods like XL-MS, with the MP and XLP scores providing reliable metrics to assess the quality of the predicted models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.09.11.557128

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Manalastas-Cantos, K., Adoni, K. R., Pfeifer, M., Märtens, B., Grünewald, K., Thalassinos, K., & Topf, M.
Affiliations
  • Leibniz Institute of Virology (LIV) (DE)
  • University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Topf, Maya
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-09-11
OpenAlex
W4386640764
Cited by
1
References
3
Citations by year
2024: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Desy publication database (The Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (209250/Z/17/Z), Z/17/Z, 221521/Z/20/Z)
  • Universität Hamburg (LFF-HHX-03)
  • Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Keywords
protein conformational ensembles, AlphaFold2, cross-linking mass spectrometry, complement C3, luciferase, protein structure prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review