The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
KINNTREX: A Neural Network Unveils Protein Mechanism from Time Resolved X-ray Crystallography
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1107/s2052252524002392 · Paper page
Abstract
Here, a machine learning method based on a kinetically informed neural network (NN) is introduced. The proposed method is designed to analyze a time series of difference electron density (DED) maps from a time-resolved X-ray crystallographic experiment. The method is named KINNTREX (Kinetics Inspired NN for Time-Resolved X-ray Crystallography). To validate KINNTREX, multiple realistic scenarios were simulated with increasing level of complexity. For the simulations, time-resolved X-ray data was generated that mimic data collected from the photocycle of the photoactive yellow protein (PYP). KINNTREX only requires the number of intermediates and approximate relaxation times (both obtained from a singular valued decomposition) and does not require an assumption of a candidate mechanism. It successfully predicts a consistent chemical kinetic mechanism, together with difference electron density maps of the intermediates that appear during the reaction. These features make KINNTREX attractive for tackling a wide range of biomolecular questions. In addition, the versatility of KINNTREX can inspire more NN-based applications to time-resolved data from biological macromolecules obtained by other methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- 10.1038/146837a0 · DOI
- Bengio, Y. (2012). Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade: Second Edition, 437–478. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/206757a0 · DOI
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.34.123 · DOI
- 2008, Nature Methods, 5, 881, 10.1038/nmeth.1255 · DOI
- Chen, N. , Karl, M. & Smagt, P. v. d. (2016). 2016 IEEE-RAS 16th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), pp. 629–636.
- 10.1073/pnas.1002951107 · DOI
- Cornish-Bowden, A. (2004). Fundamentals of Enzyme Kinetics. Portland Press.
- 10.1088/0034-4885/66/10/R05 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00344251 · DOI · Paper page
- 2018, Pattern Recogn, 77, 354, 10.1016/j.patcog.2017.10.013 · DOI · Paper page
- 1971, Acta Crystallographica Section B, 27, 1414, 10.1107/S0567740871004060 · DOI
- Henry, E. R. & Hofrichter, J. (1992a). Methods in Enzymology, pp. 129–192: Academic Press. · DOI
- 10.1016/0076-6879(92)10010-B · DOI
- 10.1126/science.7761831 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80643-5 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0409035102 · DOI
- 1996, Computer, 29, 31
- 2021, J Phys Chem A, 125, 1082, 10.1021/acs.jpca.0c09316 · DOI
- 10.1038/nchem.1565 · DOI
- 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 16, 175, 10.1109/TNN.2004.839353 · DOI
- 2021, Nat Rev Phys, 3, 422, 10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Kingma, D. P. , Ba, J. A. & Adam, J. (2020). arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980106.
- LeCun, Y. , Touresky, D. , Hinton, G. & Sejnowski, T. (1988). Proceedings of the 1988 connectionist models summer school, pp. 21–28. San Mateo, CA, USA.
- 10.1090/qam/10666 · DOI
- Maas, A. L. , Hannun, A. Y. & Ng, A. Y. (2013). ICML Workshop on Deep Learning for Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.
- 10.1137/0111030 · DOI · Paper page
- Medsker, L. R. & Jain, L. C. (2000). Recurrent neural networks : design and applications.Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00033 · DOI
- 1987, Biochemistry-Us, 26, 418, 10.1021/bi00376a012 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.bb.18.060189.001521 · DOI
- 10.1021/cr990039q · DOI
- 1995, Biophysical Journal, 68, 1490, 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80321-8 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12915-018-0524-5 · DOI
- 10.1107/S2052252521008125 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0033583507004635 · DOI · Paper page
- 2019, Journal of Computational Physics, 378, 686, 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 · DOI · Paper page
- 2005, Structure, 13, 55, 10.1016/j.str.2004.10.016 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444904004160 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0909049599006366 · DOI
- 2001, Biochemistry-Us, 40, 13788, 10.1021/bi0107142 · DOI
- 10.1037/h0042519 · DOI · Paper page
- Schmidt, M. (2019). Int J Mol Sci 20. · DOI
- 2023, Struct Dyn, 10, 044303, 10.1063/4.0000196 · DOI
- 2010, Acta Crystallogr A, 66, 198, 10.1107/S0108767309054166 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75018-8 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444913025997 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1210938109 · DOI
- 10.1128/jb.175.10.3096-3104.1993 · DOI
- Srajer, V. & Schmidt, M. (2017). J Phys D Appl Phys 50. · DOI · Paper page
- Steinfeld, J. I. , Francisco, J. S. & Hase, W. L. (1999). Chemical kinetics and dynamics. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
- 2021, Crystallography Reviews, 27, 54, 10.1080/0889311X.2021.1982914 · DOI
- 2021, Chemical Reviews, 121, 9873, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00749 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444910045749 · DOI · Paper page
- 1990, J Biol Chem, 265, 22059, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)45665-7 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2833-4 · DOI
- 2020, J Chem Theory Comput, 16, 5410, 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00347 · DOI
- Zeiler, M. D. , Ranzato, M. , Monga, R. , Mao, M. , Yang, K. , Le, Q. V. , Nguyen, P. , Senior, A. , Vanhoucke, V. , Dean, J. & Hinton, G. E. (2013). Int Conf Acoust Spee, 3517–3521. · DOI
- 2004, J Phys Chem B, 108, 4199, 10.1021/jp0364809 · DOI
- 10.1038/146837a0 · DOI
- 10.1016/0076-6879(92)10010-B · DOI
- 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75018-8 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Biener, G., Malla, T. N., Schwander, P., & Schmidt, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schmidt, Marius
- Venue
- IUCrJ
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-10-10
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 405-422
- ISSN
- 2052-2525 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11067743
- OpenAlex
- W4395467417
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 0.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- IUCrJ (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1231306)
- Directorate for Biological Sciences (STC 1231306)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
- Keywords
- time-resolved X-ray crystallography, reaction kinetics, kinetic intermediates, singular value decomposition, machine learning, artificial neural networks
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Bacterial Proteins, Kinetics, Neural Networks, Computer, Crystallography, X-Ray, Photoreceptors, Microbial
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review