PreprintCited by 6Enzyme Structure and FunctionProtein Structure and DynamicsPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

KINNTREX: A Neural Network Unveils Protein Mechanism from Time Resolved X-ray Crystallography

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1107/s2052252524002392 · Paper page

Abstract

Here, a machine learning method based on a kinetically informed neural network (NN) is introduced. The proposed method is designed to analyze a time series of difference electron density (DED) maps from a time-resolved X-ray crystallographic experiment. The method is named KINNTREX (Kinetics Inspired NN for Time-Resolved X-ray Crystallography). To validate KINNTREX, multiple realistic scenarios were simulated with increasing level of complexity. For the simulations, time-resolved X-ray data was generated that mimic data collected from the photocycle of the photoactive yellow protein (PYP). KINNTREX only requires the number of intermediates and approximate relaxation times (both obtained from a singular valued decomposition) and does not require an assumption of a candidate mechanism. It successfully predicts a consistent chemical kinetic mechanism, together with difference electron density maps of the intermediates that appear during the reaction. These features make KINNTREX attractive for tackling a wide range of biomolecular questions. In addition, the versatility of KINNTREX can inspire more NN-based applications to time-resolved data from biological macromolecules obtained by other methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.10.06.561268

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. 10.1038/146837a0 · DOI
  2. Bengio, Y. (2012). Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade: Second Edition, 437–478. · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/206757a0 · DOI
  4. 10.1103/RevModPhys.34.123 · DOI
  5. 2008, Nature Methods, 5, 881, 10.1038/nmeth.1255 · DOI
  6. Chen, N. , Karl, M. & Smagt, P. v. d. (2016). 2016 IEEE-RAS 16th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), pp. 629–636.
  7. 10.1073/pnas.1002951107 · DOI
  8. Cornish-Bowden, A. (2004). Fundamentals of Enzyme Kinetics. Portland Press.
  9. 10.1088/0034-4885/66/10/R05 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/BF00344251 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 2018, Pattern Recogn, 77, 354, 10.1016/j.patcog.2017.10.013 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 1971, Acta Crystallographica Section B, 27, 1414, 10.1107/S0567740871004060 · DOI
  13. Henry, E. R. & Hofrichter, J. (1992a). Methods in Enzymology, pp. 129–192: Academic Press. · DOI
  14. 10.1016/0076-6879(92)10010-B · DOI
  15. 10.1126/science.7761831 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80643-5 · DOI
  17. 10.1073/pnas.0409035102 · DOI
  18. 1996, Computer, 29, 31
  19. 2021, J Phys Chem A, 125, 1082, 10.1021/acs.jpca.0c09316 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/nchem.1565 · DOI
  21. 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 16, 175, 10.1109/TNN.2004.839353 · DOI
  22. 2021, Nat Rev Phys, 3, 422, 10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Kingma, D. P. , Ba, J. A. & Adam, J. (2020). arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980106.
  24. LeCun, Y. , Touresky, D. , Hinton, G. & Sejnowski, T. (1988). Proceedings of the 1988 connectionist models summer school, pp. 21–28. San Mateo, CA, USA.
  25. 10.1090/qam/10666 · DOI
  26. Maas, A. L. , Hannun, A. Y. & Ng, A. Y. (2013). ICML Workshop on Deep Learning for Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.
  27. 10.1137/0111030 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Medsker, L. R. & Jain, L. C. (2000). Recurrent neural networks : design and applications.Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. · DOI
  29. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00033 · DOI
  30. 1987, Biochemistry-Us, 26, 418, 10.1021/bi00376a012 · DOI
  31. 10.1146/annurev.bb.18.060189.001521 · DOI
  32. 10.1021/cr990039q · DOI
  33. 1995, Biophysical Journal, 68, 1490, 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80321-8 · DOI
  34. 10.1186/s12915-018-0524-5 · DOI
  35. 10.1107/S2052252521008125 · DOI
  36. 10.1017/S0033583507004635 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 2019, Journal of Computational Physics, 378, 686, 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 2005, Structure, 13, 55, 10.1016/j.str.2004.10.016 · DOI
  39. 10.1107/S0907444904004160 · DOI
  40. 10.1107/S0909049599006366 · DOI
  41. 2001, Biochemistry-Us, 40, 13788, 10.1021/bi0107142 · DOI
  42. 10.1037/h0042519 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Schmidt, M. (2019). Int J Mol Sci 20. · DOI
  44. 2023, Struct Dyn, 10, 044303, 10.1063/4.0000196 · DOI
  45. 2010, Acta Crystallogr A, 66, 198, 10.1107/S0108767309054166 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75018-8 · DOI
  47. 10.1107/S0907444913025997 · DOI
  48. 10.1073/pnas.1210938109 · DOI
  49. 10.1128/jb.175.10.3096-3104.1993 · DOI
  50. Srajer, V. & Schmidt, M. (2017). J Phys D Appl Phys 50. · DOI · Paper page
  51. Steinfeld, J. I. , Francisco, J. S. & Hase, W. L. (1999). Chemical kinetics and dynamics. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  52. 2021, Crystallography Reviews, 27, 54, 10.1080/0889311X.2021.1982914 · DOI
  53. 2021, Chemical Reviews, 121, 9873, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00749 · DOI
  54. 10.1107/S0907444910045749 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 1990, J Biol Chem, 265, 22059, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)45665-7 · DOI
  56. 10.1038/s41586-020-2833-4 · DOI
  57. 2020, J Chem Theory Comput, 16, 5410, 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00347 · DOI
  58. Zeiler, M. D. , Ranzato, M. , Monga, R. , Mao, M. , Yang, K. , Le, Q. V. , Nguyen, P. , Senior, A. , Vanhoucke, V. , Dean, J. & Hinton, G. E. (2013). Int Conf Acoust Spee, 3517–3521. · DOI
  59. 2004, J Phys Chem B, 108, 4199, 10.1021/jp0364809 · DOI
  60. 10.1038/146837a0 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/0076-6879(92)10010-B · DOI
  62. 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)75018-8 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Biener, G., Malla, T. N., Schwander, P., & Schmidt, M.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Corresponding author
Schmidt, Marius
Venue
IUCrJ
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-10-10
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
405-422
ISSN
2052-2525 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4395467417
Cited by
6
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • IUCrJ (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1231306)
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences (STC 1231306)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
Keywords
time-resolved X-ray crystallography, reaction kinetics, kinetic intermediates, singular value decomposition, machine learning, artificial neural networks
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Bacterial Proteins, Kinetics, Neural Networks, Computer, Crystallography, X-Ray, Photoreceptors, Microbial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review