PreprintCited by 2Doping in SportsPhytochemical Studies and BioactivitiesPharmacological Effects and Assays

Quinoa as Functional Food? Urinary elimination of ecdysterone after consumption of quinoa alone and in combination with spinach

Open access
Isenmann, Eduard, Yuliandra, Tasha, Touvleliou, Konstantina, Broekmann, Matthias, Torre, Xavier de la, Botrè, Francesco, Diel, Patrick, Parr, Maria Kristina·2023·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Abstract

The phytosteroid ecdysterone is included on the monitoring list of the World Anti-Doping Agency. Therefore, the consumption of food rich in ecdysterone is the focus of a lively debate. Thus, urinary excretion of ecdysterone and its metabolites in humans was investigated following quinoa consumption alone and in combination with spinach. After intake of both preparations, ecdysterone and two metabolites were excreted in urine. Maximum concentrations of ecdysterone ranged from 0.44–5.50µg/mL after quinoa and 0.34– 4.09µg/mL after quinoa with spinach. The total urinary excreted amount as parent drug plus metabolites was 2.60(1.09)% following quinoa and 1.71(0.86)% after combination. Significant differences were found in total urinary excreted amounts of ecdysterone, 14-deoxy-ecdysterone, and 14-deoxy-poststerone. In conclusion, only small proportions of ecdysterone from quinoa and the combination with spinach were excreted in urine. The results indicate that both, quinoa and spinach, are poor sources of ecdysterone.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.10.10.560427

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 2

Authors
Isenmann, E., Yuliandra, T., Touvleliou, K., Broekmann, M., Torre, X. D. L., Botrè, F., Diel, P., & Parr, M. K.
Affiliations
  • German Sport University Cologne (DE)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • Federazione Medico Sportiva Italiana (IT)
Corresponding author
Parr, Maria Kristina
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-10-10
OpenAlex
W4387537408
Cited by
2
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
World Anti-Doping Agency (20C07MP)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Doping in Sports
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Phytochemical Studies and Bioactivities
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Pharmacological Effects and Assays
Keywords
quinoa, spinach, 20-hydroxyecdysone, urinary excretion, phytosteroids, functional foods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review