The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Atom filtering algorithm and GPU-accelerated calculation of simulation atomic force microscopy images
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.3390/a17010038
Abstract
Simulation atomic force microscopy computationally emulates experimental scanning of a biomolecular structure to produce topographic images that can be correlated with measured images. Its application to the enormous amount of available high-resolution structures, as well as to molecular dynamics modelling data, facilitates the quantitative interpretation of experimental observations by inferring atomistic information from resolution-limited measured topographies. The computation required to generate a simulated AFM image generally includes the calculation of contacts between the scanning tip and all atoms from the biomolecular structure. However, since only contacts with surface atoms are relevant, a filtering method shall highly improve the efficiency of simulation AFM computations. In this report we address this issue and present an elegant solution based on graphics processing unit (GPU) computations that significantly accelerates the computation of simulation AFM images. The method not only allows for visualization of biomolecular structures combined with ultra-fast synchronized calculation and graphical representation of corresponding simulated AFM images (live simulation AFM), but, as we demonstrate, can also reduce the computational effort during automatized fitting of atomistic structures into measured AFM topographies by orders of magnitude. Hence, the developed method will play an important role in post-experimental computational analysis involving simulation AFM. Implementation is realized in our BioAFMviewer software package for simulation AFM of biomolecular structures and dynamics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- 10.1038/nnano.2008.100 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-biophys-083012-130324 · DOI
- 10.1021/cr4003837 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-662-64785-1 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gky949 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/ct2001045 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00338 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms19123899 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsif.2019.0244 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00991 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbagen.2019.129420 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009215 · DOI
- 10.3389/fmolb.2021.704274 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009970 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102591 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008444 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.12.050 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.yjsbx.2023.100086 · DOI
- Kessenich J , Sellers G , Shreiner D. 2016. OpenGL programming guide: the official guide to learning OpenGL, version 4.5 with SPIR-V. Addison-Wesley Professional.
- Rost RJ , Licea-Kane B , Ginsburg D , Kessenich J , Lichtenbelt B , Malan H , Weiblen M. 2009. OpenGL shading language. Pearson Education.
Metadata
- Authors
- Amyot, R., Kodera, N., & Flechsig, H.
- Affiliations
- Kanazawa University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Amyot, Romain
- Venue
- Algorithms
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-11-17
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38-38
- ISSN
- 1999-4893 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4390954355
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 0.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Algorithms (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (JPMJCR1762, CREST)
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (21K03483, 20H00327, CREST, JPMJCR1762, 22KF0153)
- Japan Science and Technology Agency (CREST, JPMJCR1762)
- Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (JPMJCR1762)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
- Keywords
- GPU acceleration, biomolecular structure, molecular dynamics simulation, computational efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review