PreprintCited by 44Epigenetics and DNA MethylationGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Somatic mutation as an explanation for epigenetic aging

Open access
Koch, Zane, Li, Adam, Evans, Daniel S., Cummings, Steven, Ideker, Trey·2023·Nature Aging

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s43587-024-00794-x

Abstract

DNA methylation marks have recently been used to build models known as “epigenetic clocks” which predict calendar age. As methylation of cytosine promotes C-to-T mutations, we hypothesized that the methylation changes observed with age should reflect the accrual of somatic mutations, and the two should yield analogous aging estimates. In analysis of multimodal data from 9,331 human individuals, we find that CpG mutations indeed coincide with changes in methylation, not only at the mutated site but also with pervasive remodeling of the methylome out to ±10 kilobases. This one-to-many mapping enables mutation-based predictions of age that agree with epigenetic clocks, including which individuals are aging faster or slower than expected. Moreover, genomic loci where mutations accumulate with age also tend to have methylation patterns that are especially predictive of age. These results suggest a close coupling between the accumulation of sporadic somatic mutations and the widespread changes in methylation observed over the course of life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.12.08.569638

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Koch, Z., Li, A., Evans, D. S., Cummings, S., & Ideker, T.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
  • Cummings, Steven
  • Ideker, Trey
Venue
Nature Aging
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-12-09
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
709-719
ISSN
2662-8465 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406334300
Cited by
44
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 2
FWCI
12.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Nature Aging (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (U54CA274502, P41 GM103504)
  • National Institutes of Health (GM 103504)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG059416)
  • National Cancer Institute (U54CA274502)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P41GM103504)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
somatic mutations, epigenetic aging, DNA methylation, epigenetic clocks, age prediction, accelerated aging, C>T mutations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review