Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
PreprintCited by 22Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecologyAmphibian and Reptile BiologyUrban Stormwater Management Solutions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of urbanisation, habitat characteristics, and management on garden pond biodiversity: findings from a large-scale citizen science survey

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105299 · Paper page

Abstract

The rapid expansion of urban areas often leads to degradation, fragmentation, and loss of natural habitats, threatening biodiversity. While urban ponds might contribute substantially to the biodiversity of urban blue-green infrastructure, the role of garden ponds is still largely unkown. We lack a comprehensive understanding of how local habitat features, different forms of management, and urbanisation might impact the biodiversity of these habitats. This study aimed to reveal the importance of garden ponds via a country-wide online citizen science survey in Hungary, Central Europe. Data from over 800 pond owners revealed the occurrence and local frequency of various native animal taxa (amphibians, odonates, and birds), and introduced animals (e.g., fish). We collected data about pond features and management practices. We tested the effect of pond features, pond management, and landscape-level drivers (urbanisation, surrounding wetland coverage) on the presence of conspicuous animal taxa (adult amphibians and tadpoles, birds, odonates) to identify the potential drivers of the biodiversity of garden ponds. Key pond features including pond age, area, aquatic and shoreline vegetation were the most important factors, while algaecide addition was the most influential management practice negatively affecting amphibian presence. Urbanisation negatively affected the presence of adult amphibians and their tadpoles, but it was not associated negatively with the presence of odonates and birds. Our results indicate the high potential to utilise garden ponds as urban habitats surveyed with the help of the public. Developing effective urban biodiversity monitoring and conservation strategies are necessary for a better functioning blue-green infrastructure. The high level of engagement of pond owners, as in our survey, can create valuable data for achieving these aims.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.12.08.570789

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 10.1079/9781780646947.0218 · DOI
  2. 10.5167/UZH-185243 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/978-90-481-9088-1_1 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Grooten, M. , & Almond, R. E. A. (Eds.). (2018). Living planet report 2018: Aiming higher. WWF--World Wide Fund for Nature.
  5. 2012, Effects of urbanization on the occurrence of Anura assemblages in the city of Szeged (Hungary), Tiscia, 39, 3
  6. 10.34811/osz.alapterkep · DOI
  7. 2017, Vegan: Ecological diversity, In R Package Version, 2, 4
  8. 10.1101/2020.02.03.932442 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 22

Metadata

Authors
Márton, Z., Barta, B., Vad, C. F., Szabó, B., Hamer, A. J., Kardos, V., Laskai, C., Fierpasz, Á., & Horváth, Z.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Aquatic Ecology (HU)
  • Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
Corresponding author
Márton, Zsuzsanna
Venue
Landscape and Urban Planning
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-12-09
Volume
257
Pages
105299-105299
ISSN
0169-2046 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406546479
Cited by
22
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1
FWCI
11.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Landscape and Urban Planning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Hungarian Research Network
  • Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (K142296)
  • Magyar Tudományos Akadémia (ÚNKP-22-5)
  • Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem
  • Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal
  • Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap (ÚNKP‐22‐3, ÚNKP–22–5, ÚNKP-22-3-I, ÚNKP-22-3-I-ELTE-568)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
Keywords
garden ponds, urbanization, urban biodiversity, amphibians, Odonata, birds, algaecides, pond management, blue-green infrastructure, citizen science, aquatic plants, non-native fish, biodiversity monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.