AlphaFold2 has more to learn about protein energy landscapes
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-024-51801-z · Paper page
Abstract
Recent work suggests that AlphaFold2 (AF2)–a deep learning-based model that can accurately infer protein structure from sequence–may discern important features of folded protein energy landscapes, defined by the diversity and frequency of different conformations in the folded state. Here, we test the limits of its predictive power on fold-switching proteins, which assume two structures with regions of distinct secondary and/or tertiary structure. Using several implementations of AF2, including two published enhanced sampling approaches, we generated >280,000 models of 93 fold-switching proteins whose experimentally determined conformations were likely in AF2’s training set. Combining all models, AF2 predicted fold switching with a modest success rate of ∼25%, indicating that it does not readily sample both experimentally characterized conformations of most fold switchers. Further, AF2’s confidence metrics selected against models consistent with experimentally determined fold-switching conformations in favor of inconsistent models. Accordingly, these confidence metrics–though suggested to evaluate protein energetics reliably–did not discriminate between low and high energy states of fold-switching proteins. We then evaluated AF2’s performance on seven fold-switching proteins outside of its training set, generating >159,000 models in total. Fold switching was accurately predicted in one of seven targets with moderate confidence. Further, AF2 demonstrated no ability to predict alternative conformations of two newly discovered targets without homologs in the set of 93 fold switchers. These results indicate that AF2 has more to learn about the underlying energetics of protein ensembles and highlight the need for further developments of methods that readily predict multiple protein conformations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Predicting multiple conformations via sequence clustering and AlphaFold2
Wayment-Steele, H. K., Ojoawo, A., Otten, R., Apitz, J. M., Pitsawong, W., Hömberger, M., Ovchinnikov, S., Colwell, L., & Kern, D. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06832-9 · Cited by 545 · cited 6× · see citing works
“This may not be the case, however, because AF2 predicts the folds of ground state oligomeric structures, such as KaiB, with the monomer model (17).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Chakravarty, D., Schafer, J. W., Chen, E. A., Thole, J. R., & Porter, L. L.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Porter, Lauren L.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-12-13
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7296-7296
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11344769
- OpenAlex
- W4401844424
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 57 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 25
- FWCI
- 21.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (LM202011)
- National Institutes of Health (LM202011)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
- U.S. National Library of Medicine (LM202011, ZIALM202011)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- AlphaFold, protein conformational switching, protein energy landscape, protein structure prediction, AlphaFold2, AlphaFold3
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review