PreprintCited by 159Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

AlphaFold2 has more to learn about protein energy landscapes

Open access
Chakravarty, Devlina, Schafer, Joseph W., Chen, Ethan A., Thole, Joseph R., Porter, Lauren L.·2023·Nature Communications

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-024-51801-z · Paper page

Abstract

Recent work suggests that AlphaFold2 (AF2)–a deep learning-based model that can accurately infer protein structure from sequence–may discern important features of folded protein energy landscapes, defined by the diversity and frequency of different conformations in the folded state. Here, we test the limits of its predictive power on fold-switching proteins, which assume two structures with regions of distinct secondary and/or tertiary structure. Using several implementations of AF2, including two published enhanced sampling approaches, we generated >280,000 models of 93 fold-switching proteins whose experimentally determined conformations were likely in AF2’s training set. Combining all models, AF2 predicted fold switching with a modest success rate of ∼25%, indicating that it does not readily sample both experimentally characterized conformations of most fold switchers. Further, AF2’s confidence metrics selected against models consistent with experimentally determined fold-switching conformations in favor of inconsistent models. Accordingly, these confidence metrics–though suggested to evaluate protein energetics reliably–did not discriminate between low and high energy states of fold-switching proteins. We then evaluated AF2’s performance on seven fold-switching proteins outside of its training set, generating >159,000 models in total. Fold switching was accurately predicted in one of seven targets with moderate confidence. Further, AF2 demonstrated no ability to predict alternative conformations of two newly discovered targets without homologs in the set of 93 fold switchers. These results indicate that AF2 has more to learn about the underlying energetics of protein ensembles and highlight the need for further developments of methods that readily predict multiple protein conformations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.12.12.571380

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Chakravarty, D., Schafer, J. W., Chen, E. A., Thole, J. R., & Porter, L. L.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Porter, Lauren L.
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-12-13
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
7296-7296
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401844424
Cited by
159
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 25
FWCI
21.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (LM202011)
  • National Institutes of Health (LM202011)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (LM202011, ZIALM202011)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
AlphaFold, protein conformational switching, protein energy landscape, protein structure prediction, AlphaFold2, AlphaFold3

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review