RNA3DB: A structurally-dissimilar dataset split for training and benchmarking deep learning models for RNA structure prediction
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.jmb.2024.168552 · Paper page
Abstract
With advances in protein structure prediction thanks to deep learning models like AlphaFold, RNA structure prediction has recently received increased attention from deep learning researchers. RNAs introduce substantial challenges due to the sparser availability and lower structural diversity of the experimentally resolved RNA structures in comparison to protein structures. These challenges are often poorly addressed by the existing literature, many of which report inflated performance due to using training and testing sets with significant structural overlap. Further, the most recent Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP15) has shown that deep learning models for RNA structure are currently outperformed by traditional methods. In this paper we present RNA3DB, a dataset of structured RNAs, derived from the Protein Data Bank (PDB), that is designed for training and benchmarking deep learning models. The RNA3DB method arranges the RNA 3D chains into distinct groups (Components) that are non-redundant both with regard to sequence as well as structure, providing a robust way of dividing training, validation, and testing sets. Any split of these structurally-dissimilar Components are guaranteed to produce test and validations sets that are distinct by sequence and structure from those in the training set. We provide the RNA3DB dataset, a particular train/test split of the RNA3DB Components (in an approximate 70/30 ratio) that will be updated periodically. We also provide the RNA3DB methodology along with the source-code, with the goal of creating a reproducible and customizable tool for producing structurally-dissimilar dataset splits for structural RNAs. Graphical Abstract: Highlights: While there is a recent surge in applying deep learning to RNA structure prediction, domain experts have raised concerns about generalization and current trends in benchmarking. Many of the concerns primarily relate to how novel RNA families–i.e. families unseen in the training set–are benchmarked, and whether the models are effective at handling such cases. Performance on bench-marks reflective of real-world applications, such as CASP15 and RNA-Puzzles, is poor for RNA deep learning models. We present a dataset–RNA3DB–that is designed for training and bench-marking deep learning models for RNA structure prediction. RNA3DB provides coverage of all RNA chains found in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). RNA3DB is clustered into groups that are both sequentially and structurally non-redundant, providing a robust way of creating training, validation, and testing sets for deep learning models. Along with the dataset, we also provide a transparent methodology as well as the source-code, making our tool both reproducible and customizable.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
New prediction categories in <scp>CASP15</scp>
Kryshtafovych, A., Antczak, M., Szachniuk, M., Zok, T., Kretsch, R. C., Rangan, R., Pham, P., Das, R., Robin, X., Studer, G., et al. (2023) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26515 · Cited by 54 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…interest in RNA, partly attributed to AlphaFold’s success, and partly due to the rise of RNA-based therapeutics [19], CASP15 joined RNA-Puzzles [20] and added 12 RNA-only targets to the competition [21, 22], where all deep learning methods performed comparatively poorly to traditional tools [23].”
BackgroundMethod
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Assessment of Nucleic Acid Structure Prediction in <scp>CASP16</scp>
Kretsch, R. C., Hummer, A. M., He, S., Yuan, R., Zhang, J., Karagianes, T., Cong, Q., Kryshtafovych, A., & Das, R. (2026) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.70072 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
- Authors
- Szikszai, M., Magnus, M., Sanghi, S., Kadyan, S., Bouatta, N., & Rivas, E.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Columbia University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-02-02
- Volume
- 436
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 168552-168552
- ISSN
- 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11377173
- OpenAlex
- W4393219516
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 10
- FWCI
- 5.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r21gm148902-02, 1R21GM148902)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R21 GM148902, R01GM144423)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- RNA structure prediction, dataset splits, RNA tertiary structure, Protein Data Bank, CASP15
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review