PreprintCited by 10Bacteriophages and microbial interactionsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A pangenome analysis of ESKAPE bacteriophages: the underrepresentation may impact machine learning models

Open access
Lee, Jeesu, Hunter, Branden, Shim, Hyunjin·2024·Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences

Preprint — published as 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1395450 · Paper page

Abstract

Bacteriophages are the most prevalent biological entities in the biosphere. However, limitations in both medical relevance and sequencing technologies have led to a systematic underestimation of the genetic diversity within phages. This underrepresentation not only creates a significant gap in our understanding of phage roles across diverse biosystems but also introduces biases in computational models reliant on these data for training and testing. In this study, we focused on publicly available genomes of bacteriophages infecting high-priority ESKAPE pathogens to show the extent and impact of this underrepresentation. First, we demonstrate a stark underrepresentation of ESKAPE phage genomes within the public genome and protein databases. Next, a pangenome analysis of these ESKAPE phages reveals extensive sharing of core genes among phages infecting the same host. Furthermore, genome analyses and clustering highlight close nucleotide-level relationships among the ESKAPE phages, raising concerns about the limited diversity within current public databases. Lastly, we uncover a scarcity of unique lytic phages and phage proteins with antimicrobial activities against ESKAPE pathogens. This comprehensive analysis of the ESKAPE phages underscores the severity of underrepresentation and its potential implications. This lack of diversity in phage genomes may restrict the resurgence of phage therapy and cause biased outcomes in data-driven computational models due to incomplete and unbalanced biological datasets.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.02.19.581114

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. 10.1038/nature04160 · DOI
  2. Clokie MRJ , Millard AD , Letarov AV , Heaphy S . Phages in nature. Bacteriophage. 2011;1: 31. · DOI
  3. 2021, Diverse ATPase Proteins in Mobilomes Constitute a Large Potential Sink for Prokaryotic Host ATP, Front Microbiol, 12, 691847, 10.3389/fmicb.2021.691847 · DOI
  4. 2020, Clades of huge phages from across Earth’s ecosystems, Nature, 578, 425, 10.1038/s41586-020-2007-4 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02724-0 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1128/CMR.00066-18 · DOI
  7. 10.1126/science.aad6791 · DOI
  8. 10.3390/antibiotics12020204 · DOI
  9. 10.13140/RG.2.2.19950.89924 · DOI
  10. Jones C , Castro DC , De Sousa Ribeiro F , Oktay O , McCradden M , Glocker B . A causal perspective on dataset bias in machine learning for medical imaging. Nature Machine Intelligence. 2024; 1–9. · DOI
  11. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.092707.153558 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1155/2016/2475067 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1002/cfg.66 · DOI
  16. 1988, Putative genes of a variant-specific antigen gene transcription unit in Trypanosoma brucei, Mol Cell Biol, 8, 2367
  17. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts014 · DOI
  18. Ho TK . Random decision forests. [cited 1 Feb 2024]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/598994
  19. Ho TK . The random subspace method for constructing decision forests. [cited 1 Feb 2024]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/709601
  20. Batstone RT , Burghardt LT , Heath KD . Phenotypic and genomic signatures of interspecies cooperation and conflict in naturally occurring isolates of a model plant symbiont. Proc Biol Sci. 2022;289: 20220477. · DOI
  21. 2022, IPGA: A handy integrated prokaryotes genome and pan-genome analysis web service, iMeta, 1, e55, 10.1002/imt2.55 · DOI
  22. 10.1101/gr.260828.120 · DOI
  23. 10.1073/pnas.0409727102 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1126/science.7542800 · DOI
  26. 2021, A new family of “megaphages” abundant in the marine environment, ISME Communications, 1, 1
  27. 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110984 · DOI
  28. 2023, Small protein modules dictate prophage fates during polylysogeny, Nature, 620, 625, 10.1038/s41586-023-06376-y · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1038/s41598-023-33011-7 · DOI
  30. 10.1074/jbc.M610115200 · DOI
  31. 10.3390/biom5031245 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/s41467-020-20241-w · DOI · Paper page
  33. Merrikh H , Zhang Y , Grossman AD , Wang JD . Replication-transcription conflicts in bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 10: 449. · DOI
  34. 10.1038/278030a0 · DOI
  35. 10.1073/pnas.74.3.1152 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/BF00268677 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/nature11723 · DOI
  38. 2022, In silico optimization of RNA-protein interactions for CRISPR-Cas13-based antimicrobials, Biol Direct, 17, 27, 10.1186/s13062-022-00339-5 · DOI
  39. 2022, Rethinking Protein Drug Design with Highly Accurate Structure Prediction of Anti-CRISPR Proteins, Pharmaceuticals, 15, 310, 10.3390/ph15030310 · DOI
  40. Shim H . Investigating the genomic background of CRISPR-Cas genomes for CRISPR-based antimicrobials. arXiv [q-bio.GN]. 2022. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.07171 · DOI
  41. 10.1101/gr.1224503 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.4238/2013.August.16.2 · DOI
  43. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1093/nar/gks757 · DOI
  45. DeSalle R , Tessler M , Rosenfeld J . Phylogenomics: A Primer. CRC Press; 2020. · DOI
  46. 2018, PGAweb: A Web Server for Bacterial Pan-Genome Analysis, Front Microbiol, 9, 1910, 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01910 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/nar/gkx977 · DOI
  48. 2020, PPanGGOLiN: Depicting microbial diversity via a partitioned pangenome graph, PLoS Comput Biol, 16, e1007732, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007732 · DOI
  49. 10.1186/s13059-020-02090-4 · DOI
  50. 10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1093/NAR/GKAA1018 · DOI
  52. 10.1038/nature17193 · DOI
  53. Shim H . Futuristic Methods in Virus Genome Evolution Using the Third-Generation DNA Sequencing and Artificial Neural Networks. Global Virology III: Virology in the 21st Century. 2019; 485–513. · DOI
  54. 10.1177/1176934318821072 · DOI
  55. 10.1038/s41598-019-40055-1 · DOI
  56. 2023, Sequencing, Fast and Slow: Profiling Microbiomes in Human Samples with Nanopore Sequencing, Applied Biosciences, 2, 437, 10.3390/applbiosci2030028 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Lee, J., Hunter, B., & Shim, H.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University Global Campus (KR)
  • California State University, Fresno (US)
Corresponding author
Shim, Hyunjin
Venue
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-02-22
Volume
11
Pages
1395450-1395450
ISSN
2296-889X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399901391
Cited by
10
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
California State University, Fresno
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
bacteriophages, ESKAPE pathogens, pangenome analysis, core genes, phage clustering, lytic phages, phage therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review