Exploring the conformational ensembles of protein-protein complex with transformer-based generative model
Preprint — published as 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00255
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions are the basis of many protein functions, and understanding the contact and conformational changes of protein-protein interactions is crucial for linking protein structure to biological function. Although difficult to detect experimentally, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are widely used to study the conformational ensembles and dynamics of protein-protein complexes, but there are significant limitations in sampling efficiency and computational costs. In this study, a generative neural network was trained on protein-protein complex conformations obtained from molecular simulations to directly generate novel conformations with physical realism. We demonstrated the use of a deep learning model based on the transformer architecture to explore the conformational ensembles of protein-protein complexes through MD simulations. The results showed that the learned latent space can be used to generate unsampled conformations of protein-protein complexes for obtaining new conformations complementing pre-existing ones, which can be used as an exploratory tool for the analysis and enhancement of molecular simulations of protein-protein complexes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Computational prediction of protein–protein binding affinities
Siebenmorgen, T., & Zacharias, M. (2020) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1448 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Wang, J., Wang, X., Chu, Y., Li, C., Li, X., Meng, X., Fang, Y., No, K. T., Mao, J., & Zeng, X.
- Affiliations
- Yonsei University (KR)
- China University of Petroleum, East China (CN)
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Yunnan Normal University (CN)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Southwest Medical University (CN)
- Hunan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- No, Kyoung Tai
- Mao, Jiashun
- Zeng, Xiangxiang
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-02-26
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4469-4480
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4399238140
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 3.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
- Keywords
- protein-protein complex, conformational ensembles, protein-protein interaction, generative models, transformer models, latent space, conformational sampling, molecular dynamics, protein structure-function relationship
- MeSH terms
- Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Neural Networks, Computer, Molecular Dynamics Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review