PreprintCited by 592Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMachine Learning in BioinformaticsCRISPR and Genetic Engineering

Sequence modeling and design from molecular to genome scale with Evo

Open access
Nguyen, Eric, Poli, Michael, Durrant, Matthew G, Thomas, Armin W, Kang, Brian, Sullivan, Jeremy, Ng, Madelena Y, Lewis, Ashley +8 more·2024·Science

Preprint — published as 10.1126/science.ado9336 · Paper page

Abstract

The genome is a sequence that completely encodes the DNA, RNA, and proteins that orchestrate the function of a whole organism. Advances in machine learning combined with massive datasets of whole genomes could enable a biological foundation model that accelerates the mechanistic understanding and generative design of complex molecular interactions. We report Evo, a genomic foundation model that enables prediction and generation tasks from the molecular to genome scale. Using an architecture based on advances in deep signal processing, we scale Evo to 7 billion parameters with a context length of 131 kilobases (kb) at single-nucleotide, byte resolution. Trained on whole prokaryotic genomes, Evo can generalize across the three fundamental modalities of the central dogma of molecular biology to perform zero-shot function prediction that is competitive with, or outperforms, leading domain-specific language models. Evo also excels at multi-element generation tasks, which we demonstrate by generating synthetic CRISPR-Cas molecular complexes and entire transposable systems for the first time. Using information learned over whole genomes, Evo can also predict gene essentiality at nucleotide resolution and can generate coding-rich sequences up to 650 kb in length, orders of magnitude longer than previous methods. Advances in multi-modal and multi-scale learning with Evo provides a promising path toward improving our understanding and control of biology across multiple levels of complexity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.02.27.582234

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 144 · Cited by 592

Authors
Nguyen, E., Poli, M., Durrant, M. G., Thomas, A. W., Kang, B., Sullivan, J., Ng, M. Y., Lewis, A., Patel, A., Lou, A., Ermon, S., Baccus, S. A., Hernandez-Boussard, T., Re, C., Hsu, P. D., & Hie, B. L.
Affiliations
  • Arc Research Institute (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Chan Zuckerberg Biohub San Francisco (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Nguyen, Eric
  • Poli, Michael
  • Durrant, Matthew G
  • Kang, Brian
  • Hsu, Patrick D
  • Hie, Brian L
Venue
Science
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-02-27
Volume
386
Issue
6723
Pages
eado9336-eado9336
ISSN
0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404349982
Cited by
592
References
144
Citations by year
2026: 285 · 2025: 246 · 2024: 61
FWCI
80.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR003142, UM1TR004921)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (U54EB020405)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Keywords
genomic foundation models, long-context language models, prokaryotic genomes, phage genome, scaling laws, genome organization
MeSH terms
DNA, DNA Transposable Elements, Models, Genetic, Mutation, RNA, Mutagenesis, Genome, Viral, Genome, Bacterial, Genome, Archaeal, Genomics, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review