The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cell cycle and Age-Related Modulations of Mouse Chromosome Stiffness
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.7554/elife.97403.3 · Paper page
Abstract
Chromosome structure is complex, and many aspects of chromosome organization are still not understood. Measuring the stiffness of chromosomes offers valuable insight into their structural properties. In this study, we analyzed the stiffness of chromosomes from metaphase I (MI) and metaphase II (MII) oocytes. Our results revealed a ten-fold increase in stiffness (Young’s modulus) of MI chromosomes compared to somatic chromosomes. Furthermore, the stiffness of MII chromosomes was found to be lower than that of MI chromosomes. We examined the role of meiosis-specific cohesin complexes in regulating chromosome stiffness. Surprisingly, the stiffness of chromosomes from three meiosis-specific cohesin mutants did not significantly differ from that of wild-type chromosomes, indicating that these cohesins may not be primary determinants of chromosome stiffness. Additionally, our findings revealed an age-related increase of chromosome stiffness for MI oocytes. Since aging is associated with elevated levels of DNA damage, we investigated the impact of etoposide-induced DNA damage on chromosome stiffness and found that it led to a reduction in stiffness in MI oocytes. Overall, our study underscores the dynamic and cyclical nature of chromosome stiffness, modulated by both the cell cycle, and by age-related factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The central role of DNA damage in the ageing process
Schumacher, B., Pothof, J., Vijg, J., & Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03307-7 · Cited by 907
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 73
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-410523-2.00006-7 · DOI
- 10.3390/biology6010012 · DOI
- 10.2147/tacg.s8884 · DOI
- 10.1002/bies.201500020 · DOI
- B. Alberts , A. Johnson , J. Lewis , M. Raff , K. Roberts , P. Walter , Chromosomal DNA and Its Packaging in the Chromatin Fiber, (2002). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK26834/ (accessed February 20, 2023).
- 10.1083/jcb.111.6.2839 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.03.014 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tcb.2019.05.007 · DOI
- 10.1101/sqb.1978.042.01.036 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00092-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90280-X · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.96.1.84 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.E18-09-0592 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.232442599 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ceb.2016.01.013 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-genet-061323-044915 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.8.11.2217 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.12.1.305 · DOI
- 10.1038/s42003-020-0953-x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0955-0674(96)80015-9 · DOI
- 10.1101/gad.345488.120 · DOI
- 10.1101/gad.1724308 · DOI
- 10.1038/embor.2011.2 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41580-019-0132-4 · DOI
- 10.1262/jrd.2016-127 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2016.05.006 · DOI
- 10.1097/MCO.0b013e32834121b1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mad.2011.04.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/0167-4943(83)90012-2 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.73524 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.023 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2017.02.025 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10815-015-0453-y · DOI
- 10.1007/s10577-018-9584-1 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.63972 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2008.06.013 · DOI
- 10.1101/gad.329705 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030086 · DOI
- 10.1242/jcs.00495 · DOI
- 10.1534/g3.116.029462 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.03.018 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004413 · DOI
- 10.1038/emboj.2011.222 · DOI
- 10.4103/2096-2924.327880 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0096710 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms6945 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/dez308 · DOI
- 10.1002/bies.20264 · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.1.60 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a059180 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa1202 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009744 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.20010 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0402724101 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.E05-04-0321 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.E11-05-0423 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003538 · DOI
- 10.18632/ONCOTARGET.28195 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.18632/aging.100372 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-55530-0_123 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41392-022-01211-8 · DOI
- 10.1530/REP-17-0153 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2009.12.044 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005944 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10577-010-9179-y · DOI
- 10.1038/aja.2011.66 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41389-018-0072-4 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1018793108 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jgg.2020.04.003 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1204686109 · DOI
- 10.1016/bs.mcb.2018.03.002 · DOI
- 10.1101/gad.255554.114 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00799-5 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, N., Qiang, W., Jordan, P., Marko, J. F., & Qiao, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Marko, John F.
- Qiao, Huanyu
- Venue
- eLife
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-03-11
- Volume
- 13
- ISSN
- 2050-084X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10979861
- OpenAlex
- W4409410025
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- eLife (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (CA193419)
- National Human Genome Research Institute (UM1HG011536)
- National Cancer Institute (U54CA193419, U54CA203000)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM135549, R01GM105847, R01GM117155)
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (T32ES007326)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R00HD082375, K99HD082375)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
- Keywords
- chromosome mechanics, meiosis, metaphase I oocytes, metaphase II oocytes, cohesin, aging, DNA damage, etoposide, Young's modulus, cell cycle
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review