The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transcription factor prediction using protein 3D secondary structures
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae762
Abstract
Motivation: Transcription factors (TFs) are DNA-binding proteins that regulate gene expression. Traditional methods predict a protein as a TF if the protein contains any DNA-binding domains (DBDs) of known TFs. However, this approach fails to identify a novel TF that does not contain any known DBDs. Recently proposed TF prediction methods do not rely on DBDs. Such methods use features of protein sequences to train a machine learning model, and then use the trained model to predict whether a protein is a TF or not. Because the 3-dimensional (3D) structure of a protein captures more information than its sequence, using 3D protein structures will likely allow for more accurate prediction of novel TFs. Results: We propose a deep learning-based TF prediction method (StrucTFactor) , which is the first method to utilize 3D secondary structural information of proteins. We compare StrucTFactor with recent state-of-the-art TF prediction methods based on ∼ 525 000 proteins across 12 datasets, capturing different aspects of data bias (including sequence redundancy) possibly influencing a method’s performance. We find that StrucTFactor significantly ( p -value < 0.001) outperforms the existing TF prediction methods, improving the performance over its closest competitor by up to 17% based on Matthews correlation coefficient. Availability: Data and source code are available at https://github.com/lieboldj/StrucTFactor and on our website at https://apps.cosy.bio/StrucTFactor/ Contact: khalique.newaz@uni-hamburg.de Supplementary information: Included
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
A structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold2 applications
Akdel, M., Pires, D. E. V., Pardo, E. P., Jänes, J., Zalevsky, A. O., Mészáros, B., Bryant, P., Good, L. L., Laskowski, R. A., Pozzati, G., et al. (2022) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-022-00849-w · Cited by 675
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- 10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41592-024-02362-y · DOI
- 10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TCBB.2022.3199758 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0054583 · DOI · Paper page
- P. Gaudet and C. Dessimoz . Gene ontology: pitfalls, biases, and remedies, chapter 14 of The gene ontology handbook, pages 189–205. Springer New York, 2017. · DOI
- 10.1093/bfgp/elq023 · DOI
- X. Glorot and Y. Bengio . Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on AISTATS, volume 9 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 249–256. PMLR, PMLR, 13–15 May 2010.
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010464 · DOI
- 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.2021171118 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkj131 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.029 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1357-2725(97)00085-X · DOI
- L. Ledesma-Dominguez et al. DeepReg: a deep learning hybrid model for predicting transcription factors in eukaryotic and prokaryotic genomes. Scientific Reports, 14(1), Apr. 2024. · DOI
- 10.1126/science.ade2574 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41592-021-01302-4 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsos.191461 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.26349 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2164-13-628 · DOI
- A. Paszke et al. PyTorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Red Hook, NY, USA, 2019. Curran Associates Inc.
- 10.1093/protein/12.2.85 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/sciadv.abk0734 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
- M. Sundararajan , A. Taly , and Q. Yan . Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks. In D. Precup and Y. W. Teh , editors, Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 70 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 3319–3328. PMLR, 06–11 Aug 2017.
- 10.1093/nar/gku1179 · DOI · Paper page
- The UniProt Consortium, 2022, UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2023, Nucleic Acids Research, 51, D523, 10.1093/nar/gkac1052 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models, Nucleic Acids Research, 50, D439
- 2007, DBD––taxonomically broad transcription factor predictions: new content and functionality, Nucleic Acids Research, 36, D88
- R. F. Woolson . Wiley Encyclopedia of Clinical Trials, chapter Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA, Sept. 2008. · DOI
- 10.1093/gbe/evx073 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-9-282 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Liebold, J., Neuhaus, F., Geiser, J., Kurtz, S., Baumbach, J., & Newaz, K.
- Affiliations
- Universität Hamburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Newaz, Khalique
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-03-15
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11769678
- OpenAlex
- W4406213434
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 0.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01ZX2210D, 01ZX1910D)
- Universität Hamburg (LFF-HHX-03)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- transcription factor prediction, protein 3D structure, secondary structure, DNA-binding proteins, deep learning, protein function prediction
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Transcription Factors, Protein Structure, Secondary, Computational Biology, Databases, Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review