Atomically accurate de novo design of antibodies with RFdiffusion
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41586-025-09721-5
Abstract
Despite the central role that antibodies play in modern medicine, there is currently no method to design novel antibodies that bind a specific epitope entirely in silico . Instead, antibody discovery currently relies on animal immunization or random library screening approaches. Here, we demonstrate that combining computational protein design using a fine-tuned RFdiffusion network alongside yeast display screening enables the generation of antibody variable heavy chains (VHHs) and single chain variable fragments (scFvs) that bind user-specified epitopes with atomic-level precision. To verify this, we experimentally characterized VHH binders to four disease-relevant epitopes using multiple orthogonal biophysical methods, including cryo-EM, which confirmed the proper Ig fold and binding pose of designed VHHs targeting influenza hemagglutinin and Clostridium difficile toxin B (TcdB). For the influenza-targeting VHH, high-resolution structural data further confirmed the accuracy of CDR loop conformations. While initial computational designs exhibit modest affinity, affinity maturation using OrthoRep enables production of single-digit nanomolar binders that maintain the intended epitope selectivity. We further demonstrate the de novo design of single-chain variable fragments (scFvs), creating binders to TcdB and a Phox2b peptide-MHC complex by combining designed heavy and light chain CDRs. Cryo-EM structural data confirmed the proper Ig fold and binding pose for two distinct TcdB scFvs, with high-resolution data for one design additionally verifying the atomically accurate conformations of all six CDR loops. Our approach establishes a framework for the rational computational design, screening, isolation, and characterization of fully de novo antibodies with atomic-level precision in both structure and epitope targeting.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
In silico discovery of nanobody binders to a G-protein coupled receptor using AlphaFold-Multimer
Harvey, E. P., Smith, J. S., Hurley, J. D., Granados, A. J., Schmid, E. W., Liang-Lin, J. G., Zhang, H., Meara, E. M., Wren, E. K., Paul, S., et al. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-72093-5 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“However, this method performs best when structural information about similar antigen/antibody bindingcomplexesisavailableandrequiresuser-speci fi edepitopes 13,14 .”
Chomicz, D., Dudzic, P., Wrobel, S., Gawłowski, T., Demharter, S., Spreafico, R., Minoux, H., Phillips, A., & Krawczyk, K. (2025) · doi:10.1101/2025.10.17.683056 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“…predictions (Eshak and Goupil-Lamy 2025; Hitawala and Gray 2024), co-folding (Boitreaud et al. 2024; Wohlwend et al. 2024), diffusive design (Bennett et al. 2024), docking (Ambrosetti et al. 2020; Sircar and Gray 2010; Jeliazkov et al. 2021) or binding prediction (Jespersen et al. 2019;…”
- Authors
- Bennett, N. R., Watson, J. L., Ragotte, R. J., Borst, A. J., See, D. L., Weidle, C., Biswas, R., Yu, Y., Shrock, E. L., Ault, R., Leung, P. J. Y., Huang, B., Goreshnik, I., Tam, J., Carr, K. D., Singer, B., Criswell, C., Wicky, B. I. M., Vafeados, D., Sanchez, M. G., Kim, H. M., Vázquez Torres, S., Chan, S., Sun, S. M., Spear, T., Sun, Y., O’Reilly, K., Maris, J. M., Sgourakis, N. G., Melnyk, R. A., Liu, C. C., & Baker, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
- Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Watson, Joseph L.
- Ragotte, Robert J.
- Baker, David
- ORCID
- Bennett, Nathaniel R.
- Watson, Joseph L.
- Ragotte, Robert J.
- Borst, Andrew J.
- See, DéJenaé L.
- Weidle, Connor
- Biswas, Riti
- Yu, Yutong
- Shrock, Ellen L.
- Ault, Russell
- Leung, Philip J. Y.
- Huang, Buwei
- Goreshnik, Inna
- Carr, Kenneth D.
- Singer, Benedikt
- Criswell, Cameron
- Wicky, Basile I. M.
- Vafeados, Dionne
- Sanchez, Mariana Garcia
- Kim, Ho Min
- Vázquez Torres, Susana
- Chan, Sidney
- Sun, Shirley M.
- Spear, Timothy
- Sun, Yi
- O’Reilly, Keelan
- Maris, John M.
- Sgourakis, Nikolaos G.
- Melnyk, Roman A.
- Liu, Chang C.
- Baker, David
- Venue
- Nature
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-03-18
- Volume
- 649
- Issue
- 8095
- Pages
- 183-193
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12727541
- OpenAlex
- W4415929062
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 168 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 159.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (T32GM008268, 2021552)
- U.S. Department of Energy (COVID-19, DESC0018940)
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-010680)
- Washington Research Foundation
- Amgen
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
- Open Philanthropy Project
- National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center
- Hospital for Sick Children
- Institute for Basic Science (IBS-R030-C1)
- National Institutes of Health (COVID-19)
- Office of Science (DE-SC0018940 MOD03, DESC0018940)
- National Institute on Aging (U19AG065156)
- National Eye Institute (T32EY032448)
- National Cancer Institute (OT2CA278687, R01CA260415, R35CA220500)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM136297, T32GM008268, T32GM153507)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Keywords
- de novo antibody design, RFdiffusion, scFv, VHH, epitope-specific antibodies, hypervariable region, influenza haemagglutinin, Clostridium difficile toxin B, affinity maturation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review