The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Upstream open reading frames may contain hundreds of novel human exons
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012543 · Paper page
Abstract
Several recent studies have presented evidence that the human gene catalogue should be expanded to include thousands of short open reading frames (ORFs) appearing upstream or downstream of existing protein-coding genes, each of which would comprise an additional bicistronic transcript in humans. Here we explore an alternative hypothesis that would explain the translational and evolutionary evidence for these upstream ORFs without the need to create novel genes or bicistronic transcripts. We examined 2,199 upstream ORFs that have been proposed as high-quality candidates for novel genes, to determine if they could instead represent protein-coding exons that can be added to existing genes. We checked for the conservation of these ORFs in four recently sequenced, high-quality human genomes, and found a large majority (87.8%) to be conserved in all four as expected. We then looked for splicing evidence that would connect each upstream ORF to the downstream protein-coding gene at the same locus, thus creating a novel splicing variant using the upstream ORF as its first exon. These protein coding exon candidates were further evaluated using protein structure predictions of the protein sequences that included the proposed new exons. We determined that 582 out of 2,199 upstream ORFs have strong evidence that they can form protein coding exons that are part of an existing gene, and that the resulting protein is predicted to have similar or better structural quality than the currently annotated isoform. Author Summary: We analyzed over 2000 human sequences that have been proposed to represent novel protein-coding genes, and that reside just upstream of known genes. These “upstream ORFs” (uORFs) would represent a surprisingly large addition to the human gene catalogue, which after decades of refinement now contains just under 20,000 protein-coding genes. They would also create over 2000 new bicistronic genes, which number only 10 in current human annotation databases. We hypothesized that rather than novel genes, these sequences might instead represent novel exons that can be spliced into existing protein-coding genes, creating new isoforms of those genes. Using a combination of transcriptional evidence and computational predictions, we show that at least 582 of the previously-described uORFs can be used to create novel protein-coding exons, generating new transcripts and new protein isoforms, but not requiring the addition of entirely new genes to the human gene catalogue. We also demonstrate that the predicted three-dimensional structure of some of the new protein isoforms hints at new or improved functions for existing proteins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- 2023, The status of the human gene catalogue, Nature, 622, 41, 10.1038/s41586-023-06490-x · DOI
- 10.1038/nrm4069 · DOI
- 2016, Detecting actively translated open reading frames in ribosome profiling data, Nature methods, 13, 165, 10.1038/nmeth.3688 · DOI
- 2024, A Massive Proteogenomic Screen Identifies Thousands of Novel Peptides From the Human “Dark” Proteome, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, 23, 100719, 10.1016/j.mcpro.2024.100719 · DOI
- Chao, K.-H. , et al. (2023). “Splam: a deep-learning-based splice site predictor that improves spliced alignments.” bioRxiv: 2023.2007.2027.550754. · DOI
- Chao, K.-H. , et al. (2023). “The first gapless, reference-quality, fully annotated genome from a Southern Han Chinese individual.” G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics 13(3). · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aay0262 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.58659 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.08890 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ng.2653 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, Accurate annotation of human protein-coding small open reading frames, Nature chemical biology, 16, 458, 10.1038/s41589-019-0425-0 · DOI
- 2022, ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all, Nature Methods, 19, 679, 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-022-04558-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41587-022-01369-0 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abj6987 · DOI · Paper page
- 2016, Thousands of novel translated open reading frames in humans inferred by ribosome footprint profiling, elife, 5, e13328, 10.7554/eLife.13328 · DOI
- 2020, Assembly and annotation of an Ashkenazi human reference genome, Genome Biology, 21, 129, 10.1186/s13059-020-02047-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.09.075 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.010 · DOI
- 2021, TieBrush: an efficient method for aggregating and summarizing mapped reads across large datasets, Bioinformatics, 37, 3650, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab342 · DOI
- 2023, CHESS 3: an improved, comprehensive catalog of human genes and transcripts based on large-scale expression data, phylogenetic analysis, and protein structure, Genome Biology, 24, 249, 10.1186/s13059-023-03088-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/MCB.01381-10 · DOI
- Zimin, A. V. , et al. (2021). “A reference-quality, fully annotated genome from a Puerto Rican individual.” Genetics 220(2). · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Ji, H. J., & Salzberg, S. L.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ji, Hyun Joo
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-03-23
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e1012543-e1012543
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11578521
- OpenAlex
- W4404565842
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 0.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH123567)
- National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG006677)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM130151)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Keywords
- upstream open reading frames, novel exons, alternative splicing, bicistronic transcripts, genome annotation, exon conservation, protein structure prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review