The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biochemical characterization of Bacillus anthracis sortase B: Use in sortase-mediated ligation and substrate recognition dependent on residues beyond the canonical pentapeptide binding motif for sortase enzymes
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.jbc.2025.108382 · Paper page
Abstract
Sortases are cysteine transpeptidases located on the surface of Gram-positive bacteria. These critical enzymes facilitate the attachment of proteins to the cell wall, and are potential targets for novel antibiotic development, as well as versatile tools in protein engineering applications. Although there are six classes of sortases recognized, class A sortases (SrtA) are the most widely studied and utilized. SrtA enzymes recognize the canonical Cell Wall Sorting Signal (CWSS), LPXTG, where X=any amino acid, although work in recent years identified additional promiscuity in multiple positions of this recognition motif. Much less is known about Class B sortases (SrtB), which target a distinct sequence, typically with an N-terminal Asn, e.g., variations of NPXTG or NPQTN. Although understudied overall, two SrtB enzymes have previously been shown to be specific for heme transporter proteins, and in vitro experiments with the catalytic domains of these enzymes reveal activities significantly worse than SrtA from the same organisms. Here, we use protein biochemistry, structural analyses, and computational simulations to better understand and characterize these enzymes, specifically investigating Bacillus anthracis SrtB (baSrtB) as a model SrtB protein. Structural modeling predicts a plausible enzyme-substrate complex, which is verified by mutagenesis of binding cleft residues at several positions. Furthermore, residues N- and C-terminal to the pentapeptide recognition motif are critical for observed activity. We also use chimeric proteins to identify a single site that improves baSrtB activity by ∼4-fold and use purified protein substrates to validate sortase-mediated ligation of two proteins using SrtB enzymes for the first time. Taken together, these studies provide insight into SrtB-target binding as well as evidence that SrtB enzymes can be modified to be of potential use in protein engineering.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 73
- 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2017.04.008 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07887.x · DOI
- 10.1126/science.285.5428.760 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.96.22.12424 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, Chemical Biology of Sortase A Inhibition: A Gateway to Anti-infective Therapeutic Agents, J. Med. Chem, 64, 13097, 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00386 · DOI
- 10.1002/bip.21472 · DOI
- Zrelovs, N. , Kurbatska, V. , Rudevica, Z. , Leonchiks, A. , and Fridmanis, D . (2021) Sorting out the Superbugs: Potential of Sortase A Inhibitors among Other Antimicrobial Strategies to Tackle the Problem of Antibiotic Resistance. Antibiotics (Basel) 10. · DOI
- 10.1021/ja039915e · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbi.2016.05.021 · DOI
- 10.1002/cbic.200800724 · DOI
- 10.1038/nchembio.2007.31 · DOI
- 2019, A comprehensive in silico analysis of sortase superfamily, J. Microbiol, 57, 431, 10.1007/s12275-019-8545-5 · DOI
- 2022, Comparative Analysis and Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction of Bacterial Sortase Family Proteins Generates Functional Ancestral Mutants with Different Sequence Specificities, Bacteria, 1, 121, 10.3390/bacteria1020011 · DOI
- 2022, SortPred: The first machine learning based predictor to identify bacterial sortases and their classes using sequence-derived information, Comput Struct Biotechnol J, 20, 165, 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.12.014 · DOI
- 2011, Catalytic mechanism and roles of Arg197 and Thr183 in the Staphylococcus aureus sortase A enzyme, J. Phys. Chem. B, 115, 13003, 10.1021/jp2058113 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M109945200 · DOI · Paper page
- 2022, Structures of Streptococcus pyogenes class A sortase in complex with substrate and product mimics provide key details of target recognition, J. Biol. Chem, 298, 102446, 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102446 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi700448e · DOI
- 10.1111/febs.13288 · DOI
- 2023, 3D structure of the transient intermediate of the enzyme–substrate complex of sortase A reveals how calcium binding and substrate recognition cooperate in substrate activation, ACS Catal, 13, 11610, 10.1021/acscatal.3c02214 · DOI
- Amacher, J. F. , and Antos, J. M . (2024) Sortases: structure, mechanism, and implications for protein engineering. Trends Biochem. Sci. · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.032523999 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1081147 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M113.509273 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2003.11.021 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00108 · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.01011-06 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M807989200 · DOI
- 10.1002/pmic.200402075 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0015969 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12866-014-0219-1 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep09449 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.RA119.011322 · DOI
- 2016, Structural Insights into Substrate Recognition by Clostridium difficile Sortase, Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol, 6, 160
- 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.09.041 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07667.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M610519200 · DOI
- 10.1002/cbic.201700517 · DOI
- 2017, Identification of sortase substrates by specificity profiling, Bioorg. Med. Chem, 25, 5002, 10.1016/j.bmc.2017.06.033 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi035920j · DOI
- 2021, Sequence variation in the β7-β8 loop of bacterial class A sortase enzymes alters substrate selectivity, J. Biol. Chem, 297, 100981, 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100981 · DOI
- 2022, Structural and biochemical analyses of selectivity determinants in chimeric Streptococcus Class A sortase enzymes, Protein Sci, 31, 701, 10.1002/pro.4266 · DOI
- 2012, Site-specific protein labeling with amine-containing molecules using Lactobacillus plantarum sortase, Biotechnol. J, 7, 642, 10.1002/biot.201100213 · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.187.14.4928-4934.2005 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M805406200 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M109.022624 · DOI
- 2020, Engineering the specificity of Streptococcus pyogenes sortase A by loop grafting, Proteins, 88, 1394, 10.1002/prot.25958 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2004.06.001 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M701857200 · DOI
- 2017, X-ray structure of Clostridium perfringens sortase B cysteine transpeptidase, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun, 493, 1267, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.09.144 · DOI
- 10.1128/JB.01520-07 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ab.2003.10.023 · DOI
- Vogel, B. A. , Blount, J. M. , Kodama, H. M. , Goodwin-Rice, N. J. , Andaluz, D. J. , Jackson, S. N. , Antos, J. M. , and Amacher, J. F . (2023) A unique binding mode of P1′ Leu-containing target sequences for Streptococcus pyogenes sortase A results in alternative cleavage. RSC Chem. Biol. · DOI
- Weitner, T. , Friganović, T. , and Šakić, D . (2022) Inner filter effect correction for fluorescence measurements in microplates using variable vertical axis focus. Anal. Chem. · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.101064198 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00102.x · DOI
- 2021, Engineered sortases in peptide and protein chemistry, Chembiochem, 22, 1347, 10.1002/cbic.202000745 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi050141j · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1101046108 · DOI
- 10.1038/S41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Evans, R. , O’Neill, M. , Pritzel, A. , Antropova, N. , Senior, A. W. , Green, T. , Žídek, A. , Bates, R. , Blackwell, S. , Yim, J. , Ronneberger, O. , Bodenstein, S. , Zielinski, M. , Bridgland, A. , Potapenko, A. , Cowie, A. , Tunyasuvunakool, K. , Jain, R. , Clancy, E. , Kohli, P. , Jumper, J. , and Hassabis, D. (2021) Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. BioRxiv. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkac247 · DOI
- 10.1385/1-59259-890-0:571 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.22711 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.20291 · DOI
- 2015, GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers, SoftwareX, 1–2, 19
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt055 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.20035 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.470117 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.328693 · DOI
- Hess, B. , Bekker, H. , Berendsen, H. J. C. , and Fraaije, J. G. E. M . (1997) LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J. Comput. Chem. · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gky379 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M115.670984 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackson, S. N., Blount, J. M., Croney, K. A., Lee, D. E., Ibershof, J. W., Whitham, K. M., McCarty, J., Antos, J. M., & Amacher, J. F.
- Affiliations
- Western Washington University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Antos, John M.
- Amacher, Jeanine F.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-05-07
- Volume
- 301
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 108382-108382
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11987632
- OpenAlex
- W4408149914
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2044958)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- U.S. Department of Energy (S 10 OD021832, DE AC02 05CH11231)
- Research Corporation for Science Advancement (CHE-2102189)
- National Institutes of Health (1s10od021832-01, 1r15gm154315-01)
- Office of Science
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R15 GM154315, 1R15GM154315-01)
- Division of Chemistry
- Division of Biological Infrastructure
- Basic Energy Sciences
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
- Keywords
- Bacillus anthracis, substrate recognition, LPXTG motif, sortase-mediated ligation, enzyme-substrate complex, fusion protein, enzyme activity enhancement, protein engineering
- MeSH terms
- Bacillus anthracis, Bacterial Proteins, Cysteine Endopeptidases, Protein Binding, Substrate Specificity, Aminoacyltransferases, Amino Acid Motifs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review