The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhancing Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) Interpretation in Neurogenetics: Collaborative Experiences from a Tertiary Care Centre
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1136/jmg-2024-110122 · Paper page
Abstract
Background: The findings of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) on a clinical genetic testing report pose a challenge for attending healthcare professionals (HCPs) in patient care. Here, we describe the outcomes of multidisciplinary VUS Rounds, implemented at a neurological disease tertiary care centre, which aid in interpreting and communicating VUS identified in our neurogenetics patient population. Methods: VUS Rounds brought together genetic counsellors, molecular geneticists, and scientists to evaluate VUS against genomic and phenotypic evidence and assign an internal temperature classification "VUS Hot", "True VUS", or "VUS Cold", corresponding to potential pathogenicity. Biweekly meetings were held among the committee to deliberate variant classifications, determine additional clinical management actions, and discuss nuances of VUS result communication. Results: In total, 143 VUS identified in 72 individuals with neurological disease were curated between October 2022 and December 2023. Of these, 12.6% were classified as VUS Hot, carried by 22.2% of the individuals, allowing for prioritization of additional evaluation to determine potential pathogenicity of the variants, such as clinical follow-up or segregation analysis. In contrast, 45.4% of VUS were Cold and could be eliminated from further consideration in the carrier's care. Herein, we thoroughly evaluated the various evidence that contributed to our VUS classifications and resulting clinical actions. Conclusions: The assessment of VUS leveraging multidisciplinary collaboration allowed us to delineate required follow-up analyses for our neurology patient population. Integration of VUS Rounds into healthcare practices, ensures equitable knowledge dissemination amongst HCPs and effective incorporation of uncertain genetic results into patient care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Horowitz, K., Fotopoulos, N. H., Mistry, A. J., Simo, J., Medeiros, M., Bucco, I. D., Ginsberg, M., Dwosh, E., La Piana, R., Rouleau, G. A., Dilliott, A. A., & Farhan, S. M. K.
- Affiliations
- Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
- McGill University (CA)
- Universidade Federal do Paraná (BR)
- University of British Columbia Hospital (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Dilliott, Allison A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Genetics
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-05-13
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-45
- ISSN
- 0022-2593 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4404448273
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 1.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nd
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Genetics (publishedVersion)
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Hereditary Neurological Disorders
- Keywords
- variants of uncertain significance, neurogenetics, variant interpretation, clinical genetic testing, genetic counseling, segregation analysis, clinical follow-up, communication of results, neurological disorders, tertiary care centre
- MeSH terms
- Female, Genetic Counseling, Genetic Testing, Humans, Male, Nervous System Diseases, Genetic Variation, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Tertiary Care Centers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review