The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Segregation between an ornamental and a disease driver gene provides insights into pigment cell regulation
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1111/pcmr.13196
Abstract
Genetic interactions are adaptive within a species. Hybridization can disrupt such species-specific genetic interactions and creates novel interactions that alter the hybrid progeny overall fitness. Hybrid incompatibility, which refers to degenerative genetic interactions that decrease the overall hybrid survival, is one of the results from combining two diverged genomes in hybrids. The discovery of spontaneous lethal tumorigenesis and underlying genetic interactions in select hybrids between diverged Xiphophorus species showed that lethal pathological process can result from degenerative genetic interactions. Such genetic interactions leading to lethal phenotype are thought to shield gene flow between diverged species. However, hybrids between certain Xiphophorus species do not develop such tumors. Here we report the identification of a locus residing in the genome of one Xiphophorus species that represses an oncogene from a different species. Our finding provides insights into normal and pathological pigment cell development, regulation and molecular mechanism in hybrid incompatibility. Significance: The Dobzhansky–Muller model states epistatic interactions occurred between genes in diverged species underlies hybrid incompatibility. There are a few vertebrate interspecies hybrid cases that support the Dobzhansky–Muller model. This study reports a fish hybrid system where incompatible genetic interactions are involved in neuronal regulation of pigment cell biology, and also identified a novel point of regulation for pigment cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 52
- W. Bateson , “Heredity and variation in modern lights” in Darwin and Modern Science. (Cambridge University Press, 1909), pp. 85–101. · DOI
- T. Dobzhansky , Genetics and the Origin of Species (Columbia University Press, 1937).
- H. Muller , “Bearing of the Drosophila work on systematics” in The New Systematics. (Clarendon Press, 1940), pp. 185–268.
- 10.1016/j.tig.2016.11.003 · DOI
- G. Haiissler , Über Melanombildungen bei Bastarden von Xiphophorus Helleri und Platypoecilus Maculatus var. Rubra. J Mol Med, 1561–1562 (1928). · DOI
- M. Gordon , The genetics of a viviparous top-Minnow platypoecilus; the inheritance of two kinds of melanophores. Genetics, 253–283 (1927). · DOI
- C. Kosswig , Über bastarde der teleostier platypoecilus und xiphophorus. Z Indukt Abstamm Vererbungsl., 253 (1928). · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132514 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.314.5803.1238 · DOI
- 10.1038/423699a · DOI
- M. Schartl , Y. Lu , Validity of Xiphophorus fish as models for human disease. Dis Model Mech 17 (2024). · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2010133117 · DOI
- 2016, Xiphophorus and Medaka Cancer Models, Adv Exp Med Biol, 916, 531, 10.1007/978-3-319-30654-4_23 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.8430335 · DOI
- 10.1038/341415a0 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1311254111 · DOI
- 2019, Histopathologic features of melanocytic tumors in Xiphophorus melanoma receptor kinase (xmrk)-transgenic medaka (Oryzias latipes), J Toxicol Pathol, 32, 111, 10.1293/tox.2018-0058 · DOI
- 10.1002/jez.b.23224 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2148-13-25 · DOI
- 10.1038/368539a0 · DOI
- J. D. Monroe , F. Basheer , Y. Gibert , Xmrks the Spot: Fish Models for Investigating Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling in Cancer Research. Cells 10 (2021). · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0091179 · DOI
- 10.1038/jid.2009.213 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M110684200 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19980504)76:3<437::AID-IJC24>3.0.CO;2-6 · DOI
- 10.3389/fgene.2020.562594 · DOI
- 2021, The Biology of Polymorphic Melanic Side-Spotting Patterns in Poeciliid Fishes, Front. Ecol. Evol, 8, 2020
- 10.1101/2023.12.30.573732 · DOI
- 10.1111/pcmr.12729 · DOI
- 10.1038/sj.onc.1205148 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aba5216 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/mc.22651 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199807)22:3<210::AID-GCC6>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.93.23.13042 · DOI
- 10.1534/genetics.119.302698 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.toxicon.2004.06.003 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.1923 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr509 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp373 · DOI
- 10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/gr.277434.122 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkt214 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/gr.268870.120 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0024657 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.21373 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191 · DOI · Paper page
- 2021, New strategies to improve minimap2 alignment accuracy, Bioinformatics, 37, 4572, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab705 · DOI
- E. Osipova , N. Hecker , M. Hiller , RepeatFiller newly identifies megabases of aligning repetitive sequences and improves annotations of conserved non-exonic elements. Gigascience 8 (2019). · DOI
- 2017, chainCleaner improves genome alignment specificity and sensitivity, Bioinformatics, 33, 1596, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx024 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Soria, E., Lu, Q., Boswell, W., Du, K., Xing, Y., Boswell, M., Weldon, K. S., Lai, Z., Savage, M., Schartl, M., & Lu, Y.
- Affiliations
- Texas State University (US)
- Beijing Dance Academy (CN)
- The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
- Venue
- Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-05-22
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e13196-e13196
- ISSN
- 1755-1471 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11681846
- OpenAlex
- W4402559715
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CA054174, RP220662)
- Texas State University
- National Institutes of Health (1s10od030311-01, CA054174, R24OD031467)
- National Cancer Institute (CA-054174, P30CA054174, R15CA223964, R50CA265339)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Keywords
- hybrid incompatibility, Xiphophorus, genetic interactions, pigment cell development, hybridization, gene flow, spontaneous tumor development, melanoma
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review