The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CryoDRGN-AI: Neural ab initio reconstruction of challenging cryo-EM and cryo-ET datasets
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41592-025-02720-4 · Paper page
Abstract
Proteins and other biomolecules form dynamic macromolecular machines that are tightly orchestrated to move, bind, and perform chemistry. Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) can access the intrinsic heterogeneity of these complexes and are therefore key tools for understanding their function. However, 3D reconstruction of the collected imaging data presents a challenging computational problem, especially without any starting information, a setting termed ab initio reconstruction. Here, we introduce cryoDRGN-AI, a method leveraging an expressive neural representation and combining an exhaustive search strategy with gradient-based optimization to process challenging heterogeneous datasets. Using cryoDRGN-AI, we reveal new conformational states in large datasets, reconstruct previously unresolved motions from unfiltered datasets, and demonstrate ab initio reconstruction of biomolecular complexes from in situ data. With this expressive and scalable model for structure determination, we hope to unlock the full potential of cryo-EM and cryo-ET as a high-throughput tool for structural biology and discovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Levy, A., Raghu, R., Feathers, J. R., Grzadkowski, M., Poitevin, F., Vallese, F., Clarke, O. B., Wetzstein, G., & Zhong, E. D.
- Affiliations
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (US)
- Princeton University (US)
- CUNY Advanced Science Research Center (US)
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zhong, Ellen D
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Methods
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-06-02
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1486-1494
- ISSN
- 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11160740
- OpenAlex
- W4411668661
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 8.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1R01HL168178)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL168178)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U24GM129539)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- cryo-electron microscopy, cryo-electron tomography, neural representations, gradient-based optimization, exhaustive search, conformational heterogeneity, biomolecular complexes, in-situ data, macromolecular structure determination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review