PreprintCited by 1Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisStochastic processes and statistical mechanicsstochastic dynamics and bifurcation

Exact switching time distributions for autoregulated gene expression models with mRNA and protein descriptions

Open access
Liu, Shan, Wu, Bingjie, Jia, Chen·2024·SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics

Preprint — published as 10.1137/24m1671566 · Paper page

Abstract

In this study, we obtain the exact switching time distributions between the free and bound gene states for a detailed stochastic model of an autoregulatory genetic feedback loop with transcription, translation, mRNA and protein decay, as well as protein-gene interactions. The analytical solution generalizes and corrects the previous ones obtained in [Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 118104 (2008)] and [Nat. Commun. 9, 3305 (2018)] for a reduced model of an autoregulatory loop that ignores the mRNA dynamics. We find that when the mRNA dynamics is modelled explicitly, the holding time in the free gene state can produce three shapes of steady-state distributions (decaying, bell-shaped, and bimodal). In particular, the detailed model with both mRNA and protein descriptions can produce a distribution shape that the reduced model fails to capture — the detailed model of a negative (positive) feedback loop can display a bimodal (bell-shaped) holding time distribution, while the reduced model cannot. Interestingly, we also find that an autoregulatory loop can produce a heavy-tailed holding time distribution and the origin of this heavy-tailed phenomenon is clarified using our analytical solution. Finally, we investigate how the distribution shape is affected by the type of feedback, the binding and unbinding rates, and the transcription rates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.06.24.600551

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Liu, S., Wu, B., & Jia, C.
Affiliations
Beijing Computational Science Research Center (CN)
Corresponding author
Jia, Chen
Venue
SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-06-27
Volume
85
Issue
5
Pages
1998-2025
ISSN
0036-1399 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414183508
Cited by
1
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (U2230402, 12271020)
  • National Safety Academic Fund (U2230402)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
Keywords
switching time distribution, holding time distribution, negative feedback loop, positive feedback loop, mRNA dynamics, transcription and translation, bimodal distribution, heavy-tailed distributions, stochastic gene expression models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review