SARS-CoV-2 neutralization and protection of hamsters via nasal administration of a humanized neutralizing antibody
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.antiviral.2025.106235
Abstract
Monoclonal antibodies are widely used for the treatment of infectious human diseases, including COVID-19. Since the start of the pandemic, eight monoclonal antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 were granted emergency use authorization. High mutation rate of the SARS-CoV-2 virus has led to the emergence of highly transmissible variants efficiently evading vaccine-induced immunity. This highlights the importance of identifying broadly neutralizing antibodies with therapeutic potential. In this study, we used a panel of murine monoclonal antibodies (mAb) to identify a subset that bound and neutralized a broad spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Intranasal delivery of XR10, the most promising murine mAb, protected hamsters against infection by Alpha and Delta variants. We next humanized XR10 mAb using a combination of CDR-grafting and Vernier zones preservation approaches (CRVZ) to create a panel of humanized antibody variants. We ranked the variants based on their spike binding ability and virus neutralization. Of these, XR10v48 demonstrated the best ability to neutralize SARS-CoV-2 variants. XR10v48 was protective in hamsters when given as a single 50 µg/kg intranasal dose at the time of viral challenge. XR10v48 features 34 key amino acid residues retained from the murine progenitor. Our work introduces a potent humanized antibody that demonstrates neutralizing activity in vivo at a low dose.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Rogers, T. F., Zhao, F., Huang, D., Beutler, N., Burns, A., He, W.-T., Limbo, O., Smith, C., Song, G., Woehl, J., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abc7520 · Cited by 1,230 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…in vitro , we performed a binding competition assay with ACE2 and a panel of previously characterized antibodies (Chi et al., 2020; Ge et al., 2021; Hansen et al., 2020; Piccoli et al., 2020; Pinto et al., 2020; Robbiani et al., 2020; Rogers et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2010; Zhou et al., 2020) (Fig.”
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Lebedin, M., Petrovsky, N., Tabynov, K., Tabynov, K., & Lebedin, Y.
- Affiliations
- Max Delbrück Center (DE)
- Vaxine (Australia) (AU)
- Kazakh National Agrarian Research University (KZ)
- Corresponding author
- Lebedin, Mikhail
- Tabynov, Kairat
- Tabynov, Kaissar
- Lebedin, Yuri
- Venue
- Antiviral Research
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-07-08
- Volume
- 241
- Pages
- 106235-106235
- ISSN
- 0166-3542 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4412392305
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Antiviral Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (HHS-N272201400053C, HHS-N272200800039C)
- National Institutes of Health (HHS-N272200800039C, HHS-N272201400053C)
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (HHSN272200800039C, HHS-N272201400053C)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
- Keywords
- SARS-CoV-2, neutralizing monoclonal antibodies, humanized monoclonal antibody, intranasal administration, mucosal immunity, Delta variant, cross-neutralization, CDR grafting, spike protein
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Administration, Intranasal, Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antibodies, Viral, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Cricetinae, Humans, Mesocricetus, Neutralization Tests, Mice, Antibodies, Neutralizing, Pandemics, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review