PreprintCited by 35Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Biosensing Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

Deep Profiling of Plasma Proteoforms with Engineered Nanoparticles for Top-down Proteomics

Open access
Huang, Che-Fan, Hollas, Michael A., Sanchez, Aniel, Bhattacharya, Mrittika, Ho, Giang, Sundaresan, Ambika, Caldwell, Michael A., Zhao, Xiaoyan +3 more·2024·Journal of Proteome Research

Preprint — published as 10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c00621

Abstract

The dynamic range challenge for detection of proteins and their proteoforms in human plasma has been well documented. Here, we use the nanoparticle protein corona approach to enrich low-abundant proteins selectively and reproducibly from human plasma and use top-down proteomics to quantify differential enrichment for the 2841 detected proteoforms from 114 proteins. Furthermore, nanoparticle enrichment allowed top-down detection of proteoforms between ∼1 µg/mL and ∼10 pg/mL in absolute abundance, providing up to 10 5 -fold increase in proteome depth over neat plasma in which only proteoforms from abundant proteins (>1 µg/mL) were detected. The ability to monitor medium and some low abundant proteoforms through reproducible enrichment significantly extends the applicability of proteoform research by adding depth beyond albumin, immunoglobins and apolipoproteins to uncover many involved in immunity and cell signaling. As proteoforms carry unique information content relative to peptides, this report opens the door to deeper proteoform sequencing in clinical proteomics of disease or aging cohorts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.07.20.604425

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Huang, C.-F., Hollas, M. A., Sanchez, A., Bhattacharya, M., Ho, G., Sundaresan, A., Caldwell, M. A., Zhao, X., Benz, R., Siddiqui, A., & Kelleher, N. L.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Kelleher, Neil L.
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-07-21
Volume
23
Issue
10
Pages
4694-4703
ISSN
1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402738677
Cited by
35
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 2
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Proteome Research (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P41GM108569)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Keywords
protein corona, top-down proteomics, low-abundance protein enrichment, human plasma, differential enrichment, clinical proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review