Reprograming of the ubiquitin ligase Ubr1 by intrinsically disordered Roq1 through cooperating multifunctional motifs
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s44318-025-00375-7
Abstract
One way cells control the speed and specificity of protein degradation is by regulating the activity of ubiquitin ligases. Upon proteotoxic stress in yeast, the intrinsically disordered protein Roq1 binds the ubiquitin ligase Ubr1 as a pseudosubstrate, thereby modulating the degradation of substrates of the N-degron pathway and promoting the elimination of misfolded proteins. The mechanism underlying this reprograming of Ubr1 is unknown. Here, we show that Roq1 controls Ubr1 by means of two cooperating multifunctional motifs. The N-terminal arginine and a short hydrophobic motif of Roq1 interact with Ubr1 as part of a heterobivalent binding mechanism. Via its N-terminal arginine, Roq1 regulates the ubiquitination of various N-degron substrates and folded proteins. Via its hydrophobic motif, Roq1 accelerates the ubiquitination of misfolded proteins. These findings reveal how a small, intrinsically disordered protein with a simple architecture engages parallel channels of communication to reprogram a functionally complex ubiquitin ligase.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 54 · Cited by 2
- Authors
- Peters, N., Kanngießer, S., Pajonk, O., Salazar Claros, R., Mogk, A., & Schuck, S.
- Affiliations
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Schuck, Sebastian
- Venue
- The EMBO Journal
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-07-24
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1774-1803
- ISSN
- 0261-4189 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11914429
- OpenAlex
- W4407241249
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The EMBO Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (INST35/1503‐1FUGG, 35/1503-1, 35/1503-1 FUGG, SCHU 2364/2-1, INST 35/1503‐1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
- Keywords
- UBR1, intrinsically disordered proteins, ubiquitin ligase regulation, N-degron pathway, proteotoxic stress, protein degradation, hydrophobic motif, ubiquitination, misfolded proteins, protein quality control, Saccharomyces cerevisiae
- MeSH terms
- Protein Binding, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Protein Folding, Amino Acid Motifs, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Ubiquitination, Proteolysis, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review