Genome-wide in vivo dynamics of cohesin-mediated loop extrusion and its role in transcription activation
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41588-026-02516-y
Abstract
The organization of the genome in three-dimensional space is highly dynamic, yet how these dynamics are regulated and the role they play in genome function is poorly understood. Here, we utilized acute depletion of NIPBL to characterize the role of cohesin-mediated loop extrusion in vivo . Using this approach, we found that many chromatin loops are rapidly diminished upon loss of NIBPL, consistent with recent single locus imaging studies showing that chromatin loops are transient. However, we also identified cohesin-dependent chromatin loops that are associated with distinct chromatin states and may be “long-lived”, given that they require NIPBL for their establishment upon mitotic exit, but are persistent when NIPBL is depleted from interphase cells. In addition to the reformation of 3D genome structures, mitotic exit coincides with widespread transcriptional activation. We found that NIPBL is essential for establishing the expression of lineage-defining genes during the M-G1 transition but has diminished impact on the steady-state maintenance of their expression. At genes sensitive to its depletion, NIPBL supports a unique local genome organization defined by greater spatial proximity to nearby super-enhancers and weaker transcription start site insulation of genomic contacts. Overall, we show that NIPBL-mediated loop extrusion is critical to genome organization and transcription regulation in vivo .
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In other contexts, cis-regulatory elements can establish chromosomal contacts independently of NIPBL and cohesin.
“In other contexts, cis-regulatory elements can establish chromosomal contacts independently of NIPBL (46, 52) and cohesin (53).”
From Synergy between regulatory elements can render cohesin dispensable for distal enhancer function (2026) · cites this paper as [52]
The Main section reports residual enhancer–promoter connectivity after cohesin depletion, supporting the narrower point that some contacts can persist without cohesin. It does not show that cis-regulatory elements establish new contacts independently of cohesin; the paper’s own Results instead describe NIPBL-dependent enhancer contacts. Citation 53 is attached to the cohesin part of the sentence, not the separately cited NIPBL part. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Synergy between regulatory elements can render cohesin dispensable for distal enhancer function
Hansen, K. L., Adachi, A. S., Braccioli, L., Kadvani, S., Boileau, R. M., Martinovic, M., Pokorny, B., Shah, R., Anderson, E. C., Zhang, K., et al. (2026) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adt4221 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Popay, T. M., Pant, A., Munting, F., Black, M. E., Haghani, N., & Dixon, J. R.
- Affiliations
- Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
- Corresponding author
- Popay, Tessa M.
- Dixon, Jesse R.
- Venue
- Nature Genetics
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-10-02
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 869-880
- ISSN
- 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7128999578
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 22.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Pew Charitable Trusts
- California Institute for Regenerative Medicine
- Rita Allen Foundation
- Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
- Waitt Foundation
- National Institutes of Health (1s10od034268-01, 1s10od023689-01a1, P30 CA01495)
- National Institute on Aging (P30AG068635, P30AG062429, P01AG073084)
- National Cancer Institute (U01CA260700, P30 CA01495, S10-OD023689, P30CA014195)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
- Keywords
- NIPBL, loop extrusion, cohesin, 3D genome organization, chromatin looping, STAG1, mitotic exit, super-enhancers, cell identity genes, transcriptional activation, chromatin dynamics
- MeSH terms
- Super Enhancers, Cohesins, Animals, Chromatin, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone, Humans, Mitosis, Nuclear Proteins, Proteins, Transcriptional Activation, Cell Cycle Proteins, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review