PreprintCited by 1CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pipeline to explore information on genome editing using large language models and genome editing meta-database

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1093/database/baaf022 · Paper page

Abstract

Genome editing (GE) is widely recognized as an effective and valuable technology in life sciences research. However, certain genes are difficult to edit depending on some factors such as the type of species, sequences, and GE tools. Therefore, confirming the presence or absence of GE practices in previous publications is crucial for the effectively design and establishment of research using GE. Although the Genome Editing Meta-database (GEM: https://bonohu.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/gem/ ) aims to provide as comprehensive GE information as possible, it does not indicate how each registered gene is involved in GE. In this study, we developed a systematic method for extracting essential GE information using large language models from the information based on GEM and GE-related articles. This approach allows for a systematic and efficient investigation of GE information that cannot be achieved using the current GEM alone. In addition, by converting the extracted GE information into metrics, we propose a potential application of this method to prioritize genes for future research. The extracted GE information and novel GE-related scores are expected to facilitate the efficient selection of target genes for GE and support the design of research using GE. Database Tool URLs: https://github.com/szktkyk/extract_geinfo , https://github.com/szktkyk/visualize_geinfo

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.10.16.617154

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 10.1101/cshperspect.a023754 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1073/pnas.93.3.1156 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1534/genetics.110.120717 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1126/science.1225829 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/nature17946 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1038/s41586-019-1711-4 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.029 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1111/febs.13248 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.ggedit.2022.100018 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.ggedit.2022.100024 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/srep19675 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/nbt.2889 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1038/s12276-024-01212-3 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.cell.2024.01.042 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/j.tig.2021.07.010 · DOI
  16. 10.1186/s12929-023-00943-1 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/nbt.3026 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.molp.2019.01.001 · DOI
  19. PubTator 3.0: an AI-powered literature resource for unlocking biomedical knowledge | Nucleic Acids Research | Oxford Academic. https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/52/W1/W540/7640526. · DOI
  20. 10.1101/111088 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/database/baw005 · DOI
  22. Zhao, W. X. et al. A Survey of Large Language Models. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.18223 (2024). · arXiv
  23. 10.1038/s41467-024-45563-x · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1038/s43246-023-00441-9 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/s41467-024-45914-8 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1038/s41531-023-00614-w · DOI
  27. 10.1002/tox.23512 · DOI
  28. 10.3390/genes13020189 · DOI
  29. 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006643 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1038/s41592-022-01454-x · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.tig.2023.10.011 · DOI
  32. 10.7554/eLife.93429 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Suzuki, T., & Bono, H.
Affiliations
Hiroshima University (JP)
Corresponding author
Bono, Hidemasa
Venue
Database
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-10-17
Volume
2025
ISSN
1758-0463 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408266186
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Database (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University Fellowship Creation Project for Creating Scientific and Technological Innovation (JPMJFS2129)
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (JPMJFS2129, JPMJPF2010)
  • Program on Open Innovation Platform with Enterprises, Research Institute and Academia (JPMJPF2010)
  • Co-creation place formation support program (JPMJPF2010)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
genome editing, large language models, information extraction
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Large Language Models, Animals, Humans, Programming Languages, Databases, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review